Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development
Descripción del Articulo
Objective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were p...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Universidad de Huánuco |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.localhost:article/88 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Humanos Psicometría Reproducibilidad de resultados Encuestas y cuestionarios Evaluación de resultados atención médica Practica profesional Personal educativo Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Outcome Assessment Health Care Professional Practice Educational Personnel Psicometria Reprodutibilidade dos resultados Pesquisas e questionários Avaliação dos resultados Cuidados de saúde Prática profissional Pessoal educativo |
Sumario: | Objective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were processed by Aiken's V coefficient, confirming values by dimensions. Results. For the professional development variable, the values were: pedagogical = 0.97, social personal = 0.96, and institutional = 0.98. For the reflective practice variable, the values were: reflection in practice = 0.98, reflection on practice = 0.97 and reflection for practice = 0.98. Similarly, for the pilot test, 18 subjects participated according to the profile required by the research, obtaining reliability results alfa = 0.901 on 30 items of the professional development construct, and alfa = 0.948 on 20 items of the reflective practice construct. It has allowed to structure items and articulate criteria and dimensions for each variable of the research. Conclusion. The measurement result of the questionnaires is reliable. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).