Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development
Descripción del Articulo
Objective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were p...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad de Huánuco |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.localhost:article/88 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Humanos Psicometría Reproducibilidad de resultados Encuestas y cuestionarios Evaluación de resultados atención médica Practica profesional Personal educativo Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Outcome Assessment Health Care Professional Practice Educational Personnel Psicometria Reprodutibilidade dos resultados Pesquisas e questionários Avaliação dos resultados Cuidados de saúde Prática profissional Pessoal educativo |
| id |
REVUDH_b6f12c88f748e84331df200183fdedb8 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.localhost:article/88 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUDH |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development Construcción y validación de cuestionarios sobre la práctica reflexiva y el desarrollo profesional docente Construção e validação de questionários sobre prática reflexiva e desenvolvimento profissional dos professores. |
| title |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development |
| spellingShingle |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development Porras Flores, Héctor Humanos Psicometría Reproducibilidad de resultados Encuestas y cuestionarios Evaluación de resultados atención médica Practica profesional Personal educativo Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Outcome Assessment Health Care Professional Practice Educational Personnel Humanos Psicometria Reprodutibilidade dos resultados Pesquisas e questionários Avaliação dos resultados Cuidados de saúde Prática profissional Pessoal educativo |
| title_short |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development |
| title_full |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development |
| title_fullStr |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development |
| title_sort |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Porras Flores, Héctor |
| author |
Porras Flores, Héctor |
| author_facet |
Porras Flores, Héctor |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Humanos Psicometría Reproducibilidad de resultados Encuestas y cuestionarios Evaluación de resultados atención médica Practica profesional Personal educativo Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Outcome Assessment Health Care Professional Practice Educational Personnel Humanos Psicometria Reprodutibilidade dos resultados Pesquisas e questionários Avaliação dos resultados Cuidados de saúde Prática profissional Pessoal educativo |
| topic |
Humanos Psicometría Reproducibilidad de resultados Encuestas y cuestionarios Evaluación de resultados atención médica Practica profesional Personal educativo Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Outcome Assessment Health Care Professional Practice Educational Personnel Humanos Psicometria Reprodutibilidade dos resultados Pesquisas e questionários Avaliação dos resultados Cuidados de saúde Prática profissional Pessoal educativo |
| description |
Objective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were processed by Aiken's V coefficient, confirming values by dimensions. Results. For the professional development variable, the values were: pedagogical = 0.97, social personal = 0.96, and institutional = 0.98. For the reflective practice variable, the values were: reflection in practice = 0.98, reflection on practice = 0.97 and reflection for practice = 0.98. Similarly, for the pilot test, 18 subjects participated according to the profile required by the research, obtaining reliability results alfa = 0.901 on 30 items of the professional development construct, and alfa = 0.948 on 20 items of the reflective practice construct. It has allowed to structure items and articulate criteria and dimensions for each variable of the research. Conclusion. The measurement result of the questionnaires is reliable. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-05 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e |
| url |
http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e/77 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Desafios https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Desafios https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Huánuco UDH |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Huánuco UDH |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Desafios; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Desafíos (ene-jun); 48-61 2307-6100 2706-9559 reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco instname:Universidad de Huánuco instacron:UDH |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Huánuco |
| instacron_str |
UDH |
| institution |
UDH |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1830216622808236032 |
| spelling |
Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional DevelopmentConstrucción y validación de cuestionarios sobre la práctica reflexiva y el desarrollo profesional docenteConstrução e validação de questionários sobre prática reflexiva e desenvolvimento profissional dos professores.Porras Flores, HéctorHumanosPsicometríaReproducibilidad de resultadosEncuestas y cuestionariosEvaluación de resultadosatención médicaPractica profesionalPersonal educativoHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesOutcome AssessmentHealth CareProfessional PracticeEducational PersonnelHumanosPsicometriaReprodutibilidade dos resultadosPesquisas e questionáriosAvaliação dos resultadosCuidados de saúdePrática profissionalPessoal educativoObjective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were processed by Aiken's V coefficient, confirming values by dimensions. Results. For the professional development variable, the values were: pedagogical = 0.97, social personal = 0.96, and institutional = 0.98. For the reflective practice variable, the values were: reflection in practice = 0.98, reflection on practice = 0.97 and reflection for practice = 0.98. Similarly, for the pilot test, 18 subjects participated according to the profile required by the research, obtaining reliability results alfa = 0.901 on 30 items of the professional development construct, and alfa = 0.948 on 20 items of the reflective practice construct. It has allowed to structure items and articulate criteria and dimensions for each variable of the research. Conclusion. The measurement result of the questionnaires is reliable.Objetivo. Construir y validar cuestionarios sobre la práctica reflexiva y el desarrollo profesional docente en ejercicio. Método. Fue un estudio psicométrico de validez y confiabilidad de contenidos mediante la aplicación de una prueba piloto; en la primera medida participaron 20 jueces expertos, cuyos datos fueron procesados por el coeficiente V de Aiken, confirmando valores por dimensiones. Resultados. Para la variable desarrollo profesional, los valores fueron: pedagógico = 0,97, personal social = 0,96 e institucional = 0,98; mientras que para la variable práctica reflexiva los valores fueron: reflexión en la práctica = 0,98, reflexión sobre la práctica = 0,97 y reflexión para la práctica = 0,98. De igual manera, para la prueba piloto participaron 18 sujetos según el perfil requerido por la investigación, obteniendo resultados de confiabilidad alfa = 0,901 sobre 30 ítems del constructo desarrollo profesional y alfa = 0,948 sobre 20 ítems del constructo práctica reflexiva; los cuales ha permitido estructurar los ítems y articular criterios y dimensiones por cada variable de la investigación. Conclusión. El resultado de medición de los cuestionarios es fiable.Objetivo. Construir e validar questionários sobre a prática reflexiva e o desenvolvimento profissional dos professores em exercício. Método. Foi um estudo psicométrico de validade e confiabilidade de conteúdo através da aplicação de um teste piloto; 20 juízes especialistas participaram da primeira medida, cujos dados foram processados pelo coeficiente V do Aiken, confirmando valores por dimensões. Resultados. Para a variável desenvolvimento profissional, os valores foram: pedagógico = 0,97, social pessoal = 0,96 e institucional = 0,98; enquanto para a variável prática reflexiva, os valores foram: reflexão sobre a prática = 0,98, reflexão sobre a prática = 0,97 e reflexão sobre a prática = 0,98. Da mesma forma, 18 sujeitos participaram do teste piloto de acordo com o perfil exigido pela pesquisa, obtendo resultados de confiabilidade alfa = 0,901 em 30 itens do desenvolvimento profissional da construção e alfa = 0,948 em 20 itens da prática reflexiva da construção; o que permitiu estruturar os itens e articular critérios e dimensões para cada variável da pesquisa. Conclusão. Os resultados das medições dos questionários são confiáveis.Universidad de Huánuco UDH2020-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141eDesafios; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Desafíos (ene-jun); 48-612307-61002706-9559reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Huánucoinstname:Universidad de Huánucoinstacron:UDHspahttp://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e/77Derechos de autor 2021 Desafioshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.localhost:article/882025-04-11T22:18:25Z |
| score |
13.888049 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
