The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period

Descripción del Articulo

This paper has a dual objective. On the one hand, it aims to reconstruct the challenges Husserl encountered in his attempt to conceptualize phantasy and perception during the pre-1904/1905 period. On the other hand, it proposes the following hypothesis: whereas it is well-established that the scheme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Guerrero Cordero, Felipe Iván
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32979
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Husserl
perception
phantasy
image
apprehension
percepción
fantasía
imagen
aprehensión
id REVPUCP_5e11bb973c5199ce220a834989791c73
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32979
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 periodEl desarrollo de la distinción percepción-fantasía en la fenomenología de Edmund Husserl. Repensando las limitaciones del período previo a 1904/5Guerrero Cordero, Felipe IvánHusserlperceptionphantasyimageapprehensionHusserlpercepciónfantasíaimagenaprehensiónThis paper has a dual objective. On the one hand, it aims to reconstruct the challenges Husserl encountered in his attempt to conceptualize phantasy and perception during the pre-1904/1905 period. On the other hand, it proposes the following hypothesis: whereas it is well-established that the schemes of image-thing (Bild-Sache) and act-content are inadequate for a precise conceptualization of the experience of phantasy, two concepts enable a more accurate description: the idea of reproduction and the notion of indication (Anhalt) of being. The latter concept emerges in the Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie Vorlesung of 1902/1903. By examining these issues, we gain insight into both the limitations and strengths of the image-thing and the act-content of apprehension models, particularly regarding the relationship between perception and phantasy.Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo. Por una parte, busca reconstituir los problemas a los cuales Husserl se vio enfrentado en su intento por conceptualizar la fantasía y la percepción en su período previo a 1904/5. Por otro lado, busca sostener la siguiente hipótesis: si bien es consabido que, desde el esquema imagen-cosa (Bild-Sache) y del esquema acto-contenido de la aprehensión, no era posible una conceptualización precisa de la experiencia de fantasía, hay, sin embargo, dos ideas que permiten una descripción más justa, a saber, la de reproducción y la de indicio (Anhalt) de ser. Esta última aparece en la Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie Vorlesung de 1902/3. Esto permitirá ver las limitaciones y virtudes tanto del modelo de la imagen-cosa, como del modelo acto-contenido de la aprehensión en torno al problema de la relación percepción-fantasía.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades2025-12-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979Areté; Vol. 37 Núm. 2 (2025); 362-3802223-37411016-913Xreponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979/28436http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/329792025-12-25T17:39:06Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
El desarrollo de la distinción percepción-fantasía en la fenomenología de Edmund Husserl. Repensando las limitaciones del período previo a 1904/5
title The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
spellingShingle The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
Guerrero Cordero, Felipe Iván
Husserl
perception
phantasy
image
apprehension
Husserl
percepción
fantasía
imagen
aprehensión
title_short The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
title_full The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
title_fullStr The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
title_full_unstemmed The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
title_sort The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Guerrero Cordero, Felipe Iván
author Guerrero Cordero, Felipe Iván
author_facet Guerrero Cordero, Felipe Iván
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Husserl
perception
phantasy
image
apprehension
Husserl
percepción
fantasía
imagen
aprehensión
topic Husserl
perception
phantasy
image
apprehension
Husserl
percepción
fantasía
imagen
aprehensión
description This paper has a dual objective. On the one hand, it aims to reconstruct the challenges Husserl encountered in his attempt to conceptualize phantasy and perception during the pre-1904/1905 period. On the other hand, it proposes the following hypothesis: whereas it is well-established that the schemes of image-thing (Bild-Sache) and act-content are inadequate for a precise conceptualization of the experience of phantasy, two concepts enable a more accurate description: the idea of reproduction and the notion of indication (Anhalt) of being. The latter concept emerges in the Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie Vorlesung of 1902/1903. By examining these issues, we gain insight into both the limitations and strengths of the image-thing and the act-content of apprehension models, particularly regarding the relationship between perception and phantasy.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979/28436
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Departamento de Humanidades
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Areté; Vol. 37 Núm. 2 (2025); 362-380
2223-3741
1016-913X
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1852951386416742400
score 13.97985
The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares