The Development of the Distinction between Perception and Phantasy in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Rethinking the Limitations of the pre-1904/5 period

Descripción del Articulo

This paper has a dual objective. On the one hand, it aims to reconstruct the challenges Husserl encountered in his attempt to conceptualize phantasy and perception during the pre-1904/1905 period. On the other hand, it proposes the following hypothesis: whereas it is well-established that the scheme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Guerrero Cordero, Felipe Iván
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32979
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/32979
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Husserl
perception
phantasy
image
apprehension
percepción
fantasía
imagen
aprehensión
Descripción
Sumario:This paper has a dual objective. On the one hand, it aims to reconstruct the challenges Husserl encountered in his attempt to conceptualize phantasy and perception during the pre-1904/1905 period. On the other hand, it proposes the following hypothesis: whereas it is well-established that the schemes of image-thing (Bild-Sache) and act-content are inadequate for a precise conceptualization of the experience of phantasy, two concepts enable a more accurate description: the idea of reproduction and the notion of indication (Anhalt) of being. The latter concept emerges in the Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie Vorlesung of 1902/1903. By examining these issues, we gain insight into both the limitations and strengths of the image-thing and the act-content of apprehension models, particularly regarding the relationship between perception and phantasy.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).