Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?

Descripción del Articulo

In the largest antitrust case prosecuted in Peru during the 2000s, the competition authority fined three firms for colluding to supply oxygen to Social Security hospitals (ESSALUD). At first the case looked simple: between 1999 and 2002 these firms won tenders in the same geographical areas in proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Defilippi, Enzo
Formato: documento de trabajo
Fecha de Publicación:2012
Institución:Universidad del Pacífico
Repositorio:UP-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.up.edu.pe:11354/384
Enlace del recurso:http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Libre competencia
Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia
id UUPP_fdbb0e9364b94b3928be1d9b543f5fc6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.up.edu.pe:11354/384
network_acronym_str UUPP
network_name_str UP-Institucional
repository_id_str 3191
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
title Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
spellingShingle Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
Defilippi, Enzo
Libre competencia
Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia
title_short Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
title_full Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
title_fullStr Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
title_full_unstemmed Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
title_sort Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
author Defilippi, Enzo
author_facet Defilippi, Enzo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Defilippi, Enzo
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Libre competencia
Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia
topic Libre competencia
Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia
description In the largest antitrust case prosecuted in Peru during the 2000s, the competition authority fined three firms for colluding to supply oxygen to Social Security hospitals (ESSALUD). At first the case looked simple: between 1999 and 2002 these firms won tenders in the same geographical areas in processes where the other two bidders always disqualified themselves. Moreover, this is an industry with a history of anticompetitive practices, since producers of industrial and medical gases have been found guilty of collusion in several countries, including Brazil, Argentina, Chile and the European Union. However, a deeper look at the economic evidence of the case shows that it was not conclusive, since the collusion hypothesis cannot explain key facts: the reason for which the firms disqualified themselves, since the others did not require it to win the tenders; the reason why the firms would maintain a collusive agreement that could not provide higher benefits than competition; and the price evidence that shows ESSALUD was exerting market power at the same time it was the supposed victim of a collusion. Likewise, the collusion hypothesis implies that the behavior of the firms was irrational, since i) a producer representing 85% of the market colluded with two firms representing 10% and 5%, ii) to allow them to gain market share at its expense, iii) to sell the product at increasingly lower prices than those paid by the rest of buyers, iv) through contracts obtained bidding the lowest possible price. This paper argues the collusion could not be proven and thus, the case should have been dropped.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-04T18:24:17Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-04T18:24:17Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
format workingPaper
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384
dc.identifier.citation.es_PE.fl_str_mv Defilippi, E. (2012). Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384
url http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384
identifier_str_mv Defilippi, E. (2012). Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv Documento de discusión;n° DD/12/05
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv Universidad del Pacífico. Centro de Investigación
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv PE
dc.source.es_PE.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad del Pacífico - UP
Universidad del Pacífico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:UP-Institucional
instname:Universidad del Pacífico
instacron:UP
instname_str Universidad del Pacífico
instacron_str UP
institution UP
reponame_str UP-Institucional
collection UP-Institucional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/ea0e786d-eb6b-4484-97b2-aaff9fa514d9/content
https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/faeb0dc0-1072-4879-b8a7-eb7c239c9422/content
https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/cb63e576-c6aa-4218-bd49-ec1976eb41b1/content
https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/07d31de1-45da-4638-9ec7-58dfd9f70d94/content
https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/d055fb1e-3311-41de-8a08-159131907ee0/content
https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/39a5fc40-6156-4838-b2e3-d7604026ea72/content
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 217a5819e12fce665fd16b15c2c8faa8
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
b483dd1b7f4adbf98e88577859c5bb6c
29c99329c02b476fb58109e4100ca727
5499d5924a2d3a1ae358712b863320d4
fed957fde440a86d7cca34c35d9d793a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Pacífico
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@up.edu.pe
_version_ 1844974813417832448
spelling Defilippi, Enzo2014-08-04T18:24:17Z2014-08-04T18:24:17Z2012-08http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384Defilippi, E. (2012). Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384In the largest antitrust case prosecuted in Peru during the 2000s, the competition authority fined three firms for colluding to supply oxygen to Social Security hospitals (ESSALUD). At first the case looked simple: between 1999 and 2002 these firms won tenders in the same geographical areas in processes where the other two bidders always disqualified themselves. Moreover, this is an industry with a history of anticompetitive practices, since producers of industrial and medical gases have been found guilty of collusion in several countries, including Brazil, Argentina, Chile and the European Union. However, a deeper look at the economic evidence of the case shows that it was not conclusive, since the collusion hypothesis cannot explain key facts: the reason for which the firms disqualified themselves, since the others did not require it to win the tenders; the reason why the firms would maintain a collusive agreement that could not provide higher benefits than competition; and the price evidence that shows ESSALUD was exerting market power at the same time it was the supposed victim of a collusion. Likewise, the collusion hypothesis implies that the behavior of the firms was irrational, since i) a producer representing 85% of the market colluded with two firms representing 10% and 5%, ii) to allow them to gain market share at its expense, iii) to sell the product at increasingly lower prices than those paid by the rest of buyers, iv) through contracts obtained bidding the lowest possible price. This paper argues the collusion could not be proven and thus, the case should have been dropped.application/pdfspaUniversidad del Pacífico. Centro de InvestigaciónPEDocumento de discusión;n° DD/12/05info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRepositorio de la Universidad del Pacífico - UPUniversidad del Pacíficoreponame:UP-Institucionalinstname:Universidad del Pacíficoinstacron:UPLibre competenciaPrácticas restrictivas de la competenciaColusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperORIGINALDD1205.pdfDD1205.pdfapplication/pdf625516https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/ea0e786d-eb6b-4484-97b2-aaff9fa514d9/content217a5819e12fce665fd16b15c2c8faa8MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/faeb0dc0-1072-4879-b8a7-eb7c239c9422/content8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTDD1205 - Defilippi.pdf.txtDD1205 - Defilippi.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain49918https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/cb63e576-c6aa-4218-bd49-ec1976eb41b1/contentb483dd1b7f4adbf98e88577859c5bb6cMD53DD1205.pdf.txtDD1205.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain50828https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/07d31de1-45da-4638-9ec7-58dfd9f70d94/content29c99329c02b476fb58109e4100ca727MD515THUMBNAILDD1205.jpgDD1205.jpgimage/jpeg79905https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/d055fb1e-3311-41de-8a08-159131907ee0/content5499d5924a2d3a1ae358712b863320d4MD54DD1205.pdf.jpgDD1205.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg10593https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/39a5fc40-6156-4838-b2e3-d7604026ea72/contentfed957fde440a86d7cca34c35d9d793aMD51611354/384oai:repositorio.up.edu.pe:11354/3842025-03-27 11:04:29.317open.accesshttps://repositorio.up.edu.peRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Pacíficorepositorio@up.edu.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
score 13.269403
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).