Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?
Descripción del Articulo
In the largest antitrust case prosecuted in Peru during the 2000s, the competition authority fined three firms for colluding to supply oxygen to Social Security hospitals (ESSALUD). At first the case looked simple: between 1999 and 2002 these firms won tenders in the same geographical areas in proce...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | documento de trabajo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2012 |
Institución: | Universidad del Pacífico |
Repositorio: | UP-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.up.edu.pe:11354/384 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Libre competencia Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia |
id |
UUPP_fdbb0e9364b94b3928be1d9b543f5fc6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.up.edu.pe:11354/384 |
network_acronym_str |
UUPP |
network_name_str |
UP-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
3191 |
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
title |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
spellingShingle |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? Defilippi, Enzo Libre competencia Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia |
title_short |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
title_full |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
title_fullStr |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
title_sort |
Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta? |
author |
Defilippi, Enzo |
author_facet |
Defilippi, Enzo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Defilippi, Enzo |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Libre competencia Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia |
topic |
Libre competencia Prácticas restrictivas de la competencia |
description |
In the largest antitrust case prosecuted in Peru during the 2000s, the competition authority fined three firms for colluding to supply oxygen to Social Security hospitals (ESSALUD). At first the case looked simple: between 1999 and 2002 these firms won tenders in the same geographical areas in processes where the other two bidders always disqualified themselves. Moreover, this is an industry with a history of anticompetitive practices, since producers of industrial and medical gases have been found guilty of collusion in several countries, including Brazil, Argentina, Chile and the European Union. However, a deeper look at the economic evidence of the case shows that it was not conclusive, since the collusion hypothesis cannot explain key facts: the reason for which the firms disqualified themselves, since the others did not require it to win the tenders; the reason why the firms would maintain a collusive agreement that could not provide higher benefits than competition; and the price evidence that shows ESSALUD was exerting market power at the same time it was the supposed victim of a collusion. Likewise, the collusion hypothesis implies that the behavior of the firms was irrational, since i) a producer representing 85% of the market colluded with two firms representing 10% and 5%, ii) to allow them to gain market share at its expense, iii) to sell the product at increasingly lower prices than those paid by the rest of buyers, iv) through contracts obtained bidding the lowest possible price. This paper argues the collusion could not be proven and thus, the case should have been dropped. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-04T18:24:17Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-04T18:24:17Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper |
format |
workingPaper |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384 |
dc.identifier.citation.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Defilippi, E. (2012). Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384 |
identifier_str_mv |
Defilippi, E. (2012). Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.none.fl_str_mv |
Documento de discusión;n° DD/12/05 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Pacífico. Centro de Investigación |
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv |
PE |
dc.source.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio de la Universidad del Pacífico - UP Universidad del Pacífico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:UP-Institucional instname:Universidad del Pacífico instacron:UP |
instname_str |
Universidad del Pacífico |
instacron_str |
UP |
institution |
UP |
reponame_str |
UP-Institucional |
collection |
UP-Institucional |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/ea0e786d-eb6b-4484-97b2-aaff9fa514d9/content https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/faeb0dc0-1072-4879-b8a7-eb7c239c9422/content https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/cb63e576-c6aa-4218-bd49-ec1976eb41b1/content https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/07d31de1-45da-4638-9ec7-58dfd9f70d94/content https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/d055fb1e-3311-41de-8a08-159131907ee0/content https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/39a5fc40-6156-4838-b2e3-d7604026ea72/content |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
217a5819e12fce665fd16b15c2c8faa8 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 b483dd1b7f4adbf98e88577859c5bb6c 29c99329c02b476fb58109e4100ca727 5499d5924a2d3a1ae358712b863320d4 fed957fde440a86d7cca34c35d9d793a |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Pacífico |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@up.edu.pe |
_version_ |
1844974813417832448 |
spelling |
Defilippi, Enzo2014-08-04T18:24:17Z2014-08-04T18:24:17Z2012-08http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384Defilippi, E. (2012). Colusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11354/384In the largest antitrust case prosecuted in Peru during the 2000s, the competition authority fined three firms for colluding to supply oxygen to Social Security hospitals (ESSALUD). At first the case looked simple: between 1999 and 2002 these firms won tenders in the same geographical areas in processes where the other two bidders always disqualified themselves. Moreover, this is an industry with a history of anticompetitive practices, since producers of industrial and medical gases have been found guilty of collusion in several countries, including Brazil, Argentina, Chile and the European Union. However, a deeper look at the economic evidence of the case shows that it was not conclusive, since the collusion hypothesis cannot explain key facts: the reason for which the firms disqualified themselves, since the others did not require it to win the tenders; the reason why the firms would maintain a collusive agreement that could not provide higher benefits than competition; and the price evidence that shows ESSALUD was exerting market power at the same time it was the supposed victim of a collusion. Likewise, the collusion hypothesis implies that the behavior of the firms was irrational, since i) a producer representing 85% of the market colluded with two firms representing 10% and 5%, ii) to allow them to gain market share at its expense, iii) to sell the product at increasingly lower prices than those paid by the rest of buyers, iv) through contracts obtained bidding the lowest possible price. This paper argues the collusion could not be proven and thus, the case should have been dropped.application/pdfspaUniversidad del Pacífico. Centro de InvestigaciónPEDocumento de discusión;n° DD/12/05info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRepositorio de la Universidad del Pacífico - UPUniversidad del Pacíficoreponame:UP-Institucionalinstname:Universidad del Pacíficoinstacron:UPLibre competenciaPrácticas restrictivas de la competenciaColusión sin evidencia directa en el Perú ¿la sospecha basta?info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperORIGINALDD1205.pdfDD1205.pdfapplication/pdf625516https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/ea0e786d-eb6b-4484-97b2-aaff9fa514d9/content217a5819e12fce665fd16b15c2c8faa8MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/faeb0dc0-1072-4879-b8a7-eb7c239c9422/content8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTDD1205 - Defilippi.pdf.txtDD1205 - Defilippi.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain49918https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/cb63e576-c6aa-4218-bd49-ec1976eb41b1/contentb483dd1b7f4adbf98e88577859c5bb6cMD53DD1205.pdf.txtDD1205.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain50828https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/07d31de1-45da-4638-9ec7-58dfd9f70d94/content29c99329c02b476fb58109e4100ca727MD515THUMBNAILDD1205.jpgDD1205.jpgimage/jpeg79905https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/d055fb1e-3311-41de-8a08-159131907ee0/content5499d5924a2d3a1ae358712b863320d4MD54DD1205.pdf.jpgDD1205.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg10593https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/backend/api/core/bitstreams/39a5fc40-6156-4838-b2e3-d7604026ea72/contentfed957fde440a86d7cca34c35d9d793aMD51611354/384oai:repositorio.up.edu.pe:11354/3842025-03-27 11:04:29.317open.accesshttps://repositorio.up.edu.peRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Pacíficorepositorio@up.edu.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 |
score |
13.269403 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).