Efecto residual de tres dosis de hidroabsorvente de potasio y tres frecuencias de Riego, en el cultivo de Lechuga en Lamas – San Martín
Descripción del Articulo
Aiming to evaluate the effects of gel applied in a previous campaign was developed from research work on the residual effect of three treatments gel and three irrigation frequencies, executed between the months of March to May 2008, for: To evaluate the residual effect of three doses of potassium hi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | tesis de grado |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2009 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional de San Martin - Tarapoto |
| Repositorio: | UNSM-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unsm.edu.pe:11458/1137 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/11458/1137 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Taxonómica Lechuga Hidrosorb Edafoclimáticos |
| Sumario: | Aiming to evaluate the effects of gel applied in a previous campaign was developed from research work on the residual effect of three treatments gel and three irrigation frequencies, executed between the months of March to May 2008, for: To evaluate the residual effect of three doses of potassium hidroabsorventes on the floor, with three frequencies of irrigation on the yield and quality of lettuce in the Province of San Martín Region Lamas, during March - May 2008 and carry out economic analysis of the treatments evaluated. In the research work, the design was a randomized complete block (DBCA), with 4 X 4 factorial with three points, 16 treatments. The statistical program used was SPSS 12 and obtained the following conclusions: Water consumption was greater in the T2 670.75 m3.ha-1In rainfall, but was lower compared to other treatments conducted without application of Hidroabsorventes potassium, 2.0 gm of gel-2 recorded the highest average humidity with an average of 68.25% of the difference statistically obtained by other treatments, it is the treatment that had the highest yield with an average of 14.4 t.ha-1, the crop growing season was reduced to 37 days in compared to what normally is harvested at 60 days (Solórzano, 1992). The level 2 14437.5 kg.ha-1 to perform the economic analysis is the treatment he had with s /. 4.16 compared with other treatments. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).