Desprotección jurídica y falta de reparación integral en víctimas de delitos sexuales, en los procesos penales de Maynas, 2022–2023

• Autores: Rojas Cancino, Zulita Isabel, Perez Serrantes, Cinthia Katherine
• Formato: tesis de grado
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
• Repositorio: UNAPIquitos-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/11948
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/11948
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Delitos contra la integridad sexual; Acceso a la justicia; Reparación integral; Proceso penal; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.02

This study analyzes whether criminal proceedings conducted in the province of Maynas during 2022 and 2023 guaranteed comprehensive reparation for victims of sexual abuse through psychological treatment. The main objective was to determine whether such proceedings ensured reparation not only in economic terms but also through measures aimed at restoring the victims’ emotional well-being. The research was basic, socio-legal in nature, descriptive–correlational in level, with a non-experimental design and a quantitative approach, since it combined the analysis of legal norms and case law with statistical measurement of variables in order to test the hypothesis. The results show that comprehensive reparation was not effectively guaranteed, as no psychological treatment was ordered for the victims. Instead, reparation was limited to economic compensation, often with symbolic or insufficient amounts ranging from S/ 1,000.00 to S/ 3,000.00, even in cases involving minors who had suffered sexual abuse. In contrast, in some proceedings, the courts ordered that offenders receive therapeutic treatment aimed at facilitating their social reintegration, which reveals an unequal application of reparative measures and a clear lack of protection for the victims. It is concluded that the comprehensive reparation recognized by law was not effectively applied in practice, leaving sexually abused individuals without the psychological support necessary for their recovery and with inadequate economic compensation compared to the seriousness of the harm suffered.