La infracción del deber jurídico penal y la colusión en la modalidad de comisión por omisión en el distrito judicial de Loreto, 2018 – 2020

• Autor: Peralta Chota, Paul Michel
• Formato: tesis de maestría
• Fecha de Publicación: 2025
• Institución: Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
• Repositorio: UNAPIquitos-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/11213
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/11213
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Comisión por omisión; Corrupción del funcionario público; Infracciones administrativas; Cumplimiento de un deber; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.02

The investigation addresses how the omissions of public officials can justify the crime of collusion, using the rules of objective imputation. The investigation is justified by the need to understand how the violation of criminal legal duty, through these rules, serves as support for the crime of collusion by commission by omission. One of the main objectives is to evaluate the theory that is responsible for the study of the violation of criminal legal duty with the crime of collusion, as well as to apply the rules of objective imputation and substantiate the omissive modality of the crime. The study uses a qualitative approach, analyzing cases and legal literature, to conclude that collusion by omission is based on the violation of a legal-criminal duty, related to the position of guarantor, which suggests the obligation to control or supervise the stability of the sources of risk for the legal good, due to the position held in the state administration. Three key objective imputation criteria are identified: the scope of protection of the norm, the generation of a relevant risk, and the risk relationship, which are essential to understand responsibility in collusion. In addition, it is noted that this crime involves non-compliance with standards of behavior, prohibiting fraudulent practices in public procurement.