Fundamentos jurídicos que sustentan la facultad de tachar la usucapión notarial de copropietario en los registros públicos de Perú

• Autor: Vasquez Gil, Teresa Mariel
• Formato: tesis doctoral
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
• Repositorio: UNAPIquitos-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/11091
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/11091
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Prescripción adquisitiva; Fundamentación del recurso; Registros públicos; Condominio; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

The research work developed is focused on analyzing the legal grounds that support the power to strike out the notarial usucaption of co-ownership in the Public Registries of Peru. This analysis arises from the notarial practice that admits the procedures of acquisitive prescription of co-ownership despite the legal prohibition established in Article 985 of the Civil Code and the position adopted by the Registry Court in preventing the Public Registrar from crossing out the requests for usucaption of co-ownership. This registry jurisprudence contravenes the principles of legality and normative hierarchy, inasmuch as the Public Registrar does have the obligation to qualify the validity of the act, which does not imply a pronouncement on the merits of the notarial proceeding, as erroneously considered by the Registry Court. In this sense, the investigation is justified because it establishes a contradiction between the primacy of the right of ownership, the principles of legality and normative hierarchy against the decisions of the Registry Court that resolve the notarial usucaption deeds of co-owner. The methodology is qualitative because it develops interpretative and phenomenological aspects that allow understanding the legislative and doctrinal analysis of the legal principles related to the way of acquiring property by means of acquisitive prescription in the notary's office and its origin in the registry office. This study leads us to the conclusion that the Public Registrar has the power to strike out the notarial usucaption of co-ownership.