Controversia de roles en investigación suplementaria y el principio de autonomía constitucional en la fase intermedia en el poder judicial Iquitos 2019

Descripción del Articulo

The work was developed in the city of Iquitos in the atmospheres of the Judicial Power of Loreto, the objective was to determine the circumstances in that controversy of lists is generated in the supplementary investigation and the principle of constitutional autonomy in the Judicial Power in the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Bardales Vasquez, Liliana
Formato: tesis de maestría
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
Repositorio:UNAPIquitos-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/11478
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/11478
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Rol judicial
Controversias
Investigación del hecho
Investigación inconclusa
Autonomía institucional
Independencia del poder judicial
Etapas del proceso
Poder judicial
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.02
Descripción
Sumario:The work was developed in the city of Iquitos in the atmospheres of the Judicial Power of Loreto, the objective was to determine the circumstances in that controversy of lists is generated in the supplementary investigation and the principle of constitutional autonomy in the Judicial Power in the intermediate phase of the penal process, the study taken from three perspectives. The first one from the study point being this quantitative investigation, the you-gundo from the perspective of their purpose being basic in a first mo-mentions and then applied and the third from the descriptive study level former-plicativa, the population was conformed by the lawyers of the judicial power and the sample was constituted by the 63 right professionals. You arrive-rum to the conclusions: to. controversy of lists doesn't exist in the supplementary investigation and the principle of constitutional autonomy in the phase interme day in the Judicial Power of Loreto, b. He Articulates 346 numeral 5 are not In constitutional and the serious Diffuse Control the Artificial tool through which the irrelevancy would be determined or Not of the I Articulate 346 numeral 5, c. The Judges don't harm the principle of impartiality in the intermediate phase, neither neither they harm the attribution of strategist of the investigation that has the District attorney, d. it is viable that the Judge rises in consultation the order of so-breseimiento of the District attorney if discrepancy exists with such a decision and d. The hipóte-sis outlined work presently is rejected and the Alternating one is accepted controversy of lists since it doesn't exist in the supplementary investigation and the principles of autonomy in the Judicial Power of Loreto in the phase interme-day of the Penal Process.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).