Estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes de estomatología de dos universidades de Iquitos 2020
Descripción del Articulo
The objective of this study was to compare the effective use of learning strategies between stomatology students of two universities in Iquitos, 2020. The study type was comparative with field study, transectional contemporary, and univariable designs. The study population and sample was made up by...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | tesis de maestría |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana |
| Repositorio: | UNAPIquitos-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/7847 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/7847 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Método de aprendizaje Motivación Autoaprendizaje Estudiante universitario http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.01 |
| Sumario: | The objective of this study was to compare the effective use of learning strategies between stomatology students of two universities in Iquitos, 2020. The study type was comparative with field study, transectional contemporary, and univariable designs. The study population and sample was made up by 382 students. 212 students from the National University of the Peruvian Amazon (UNAP) and 170 students from The Peruvian Scientific University (UCP). The data gathering tool was a valid and reliable questionnaire with Likert scale. Results show that most Faculty of Odontology students at UNAP (68.4%) used learning strategies fairly adequately, whilst Stomatology students at UCP (59.4%), used the strategies inadequately. UNAP students mean scores were higher (57.4936 > 39.7226) as well as in all dimensions: Motivational strategies (56.2264 > 43.8824), affective component (55.0708 > 43.7316), metacognitive strategies (58.0778 > 35.6985), strategies of context control, social interaction and use of resources (59.2253 > 42.3303), strategies searching and selecting information (63.7824 > 39.3382), and strategies of information processing and use (56.1932 >36.1111). The study concluded that there is significant difference between the two population groups in using learning strategies as p-value = 0.000 < ? = 0.05, accepting the research hypothesis. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).