Comparación de lima rotatoria y reciprocante en la modificación del ángulo en conductos curvos según el método de Schneider, 2021

Descripción del Articulo

The objective of the research was to compare a rotary system and a reciprocating system in the modification of the angle in curved ducts according to the Schneider method, 2021. The type of research was quantitative, the design was non-experimental, comparative descriptive, cross-sectional. The stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vargas Ipanama, Karl, Vargas Padilla, Franco Giordano
Formato: tesis de grado
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
Repositorio:UNAPIquitos-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/7997
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/7997
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Instrumentos dentales
Diente
Modificación
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of the research was to compare a rotary system and a reciprocating system in the modification of the angle in curved ducts according to the Schneider method, 2021. The type of research was quantitative, the design was non-experimental, comparative descriptive, cross-sectional. The study was performed on 40 mesiobuccal canals of permanent mandibular first molars randomly assigned to either of the 2 groups, Mtwo rotary file; Reciproc Blue reciprocating file (20 teeth for each group). The instrument used was the data collection sheet for the angle of curvature of curved ducts. The most important results were: The average curvature angle of the group to be instrumented with Mtwo changed 1.7º; before instrumentation it was 28.25º and after it was 26.55º. The average curvature angle of the group to be instrumented with Reciproc blue changed 1.25º; before instrumentation it was 25.6º and after it was 24.35º. In the group to be instrumented with Mtwo, moderate curvature was 25%: severe was 75%; after instrumentation moderate curvature was 35%: severe was 65%. In the Reciproc blue group the slight curvature was 5%; moderate 40% and severe 55%; after instrumentation did not change. There is a significant difference between the angle of the curvature before and after the instrumentation with Mtwo (p=0.000). There is a significant difference between the angle of curvature before and after instrumentation with Reciproc blue (p=0.000).
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).