Exportación Completada — 

Entre la finalidad y la fragmentación: problemas contemporáneos de la “res judicata” en el arbitraje internacional de inversiones

Descripción del Articulo

Res judicata plays a structural role in international investment arbitration, as it guarantees the stability of final decisions, prevents conflicting awards, and preserves the legitimacy of the system. However, the proliferation of forums, jurisdictional titles, and judicial seats has multiplied the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: García Vizcarra, Diego Fernando
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/206912
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/33410/28635
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/206912
https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202502.021
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:International Arbitration
Foreign Investment
Arbitration Award
Res Judicata
Fragmentation
ISDS
ICSID
UNCITRAL
ICC
ILA
IBA
Arbitraje Internacional
Inversión Extranjera
Laudo Arbitral
Cosa Juzgada
Fragmentación
CIADI
CNUDMI
CCI
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Descripción
Sumario:Res judicata plays a structural role in international investment arbitration, as it guarantees the stability of final decisions, prevents conflicting awards, and preserves the legitimacy of the system. However, the proliferation of forums, jurisdictional titles, and judicial seats has multiplied the scenarios in which this principle is invoked, often with divergent outcomes, thereby threatening the stability and legal certainty of arbitral awards. This article critically examines the foundations and effects of res judicata in investment arbitration, its interaction with related doctrines such as lis pendens, fork-in-the-road, abuse of process, and estoppel, as well as the relevant jurisprudence of ICSID, UNCITRAL, and ICC tribunals. The analysis is based on a comparative approach to the main regulatory frameworks worldwide and to national rules applicable to international arbitration, while also considering studies such as the Final Report on Res Judicata and Arbitration by the International Law Association (ILA) and the more recent Report on Res Judicata in International Arbitration by the International Bar Association (IBA).
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).