Prevalence of Maxillo-Mandibular patterns in patients from 8.5 to 12 years old, using Ricketts Cephalometry in university orthopedic services
Descripción del Articulo
        Objetive: To determine the prevalence of the different skeletal patterns in a sample of patients aged 8.5 to 12 years old, using Ricketts cephalometric analysis. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was proposed, considering a sample consisting of 40 patients aged 8.5 to 12 years treated in...
              
            
    
                        | Autores: | , , , , | 
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo | 
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 | 
| Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres | 
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres | 
| Lenguaje: | español | 
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/1840 | 
| Enlace del recurso: | https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/1840 | 
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto | 
| Materia: | Cephalometry Orthodontics Mandible Maxilla Cefalometría Ortodoncia Mandíbula Maxilar | 
| Sumario: | Objetive: To determine the prevalence of the different skeletal patterns in a sample of patients aged 8.5 to 12 years old, using Ricketts cephalometric analysis. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was proposed, considering a sample consisting of 40 patients aged 8.5 to 12 years treated in the Orthopaedics Department at the University Clinic of The Universidad UTE, Quito-Ecuador, between July 2015 and February 2018. Ricketts summary analysis was used to determine the skeletal pattern and establish the maxilla-mandibular relationship; measurements of maxillary convexity, maxillary depth, facial axis and facial depth were recorded. The data collected was analysed using descriptive statistics, frequency analysis, measures of central tendency and dispersion. Results: The predominant skeletal pattern was Class II (52.5%), followed by the Class I skeletal pattern (40%) and Class III (7.5%) Conclusions: The most prevalent skeletal pattern was Class II. There was not a direct relationship or association with the patient's sex. | 
|---|
 Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
    La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
 
   
   
             
            