THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS

Descripción del Articulo

This research seeks to scrutinize the doctrinal and jurisprudential treatments of the execution of the sentence, stopping at the ideological criteria of the administrativeization of the execution of the punishment, especially those that correspond to the deprivation of liberty, typical of a pre-mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Huamán García , Elizabeth Rosmery
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/2973
Enlace del recurso:https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUSMP_2f099d1d33c0b3501e0fb7683e97da96
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/2973
network_acronym_str REVUSMP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
repository_id_str
spelling THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITSEL JUEZ DE EJECUCIÓN PENAL Y LA EFECTIVIZACIÓN DE LOS BENEFICIOS PENITENCIARIOS Huamán García , Elizabeth RosmeryHuamán García , Elizabeth RosmeryThis research seeks to scrutinize the doctrinal and jurisprudential treatments of the execution of the sentence, stopping at the ideological criteria of the administrativeization of the execution of the punishment, especially those that correspond to the deprivation of liberty, typical of a pre-modern State that favors the abusive exercise of the disciplinary power of the penitentiary administrative authority and that leaves aside the exercise of the rights of the perpetrators of the crime, not compromised by the law and the nature of the sentence imposed, as well as their fundamental rights, which the Constitution and international treaties recognize and protect; reaching the conclusion that its illegal application within a democratic State of law, which requires and imposes on the State the judicialization of the execution of the punishment, through the Criminal Execution judge as a jurisdictional tool that makes effective the protection of freedom and human dignity of the convicted person, which constitutes the superior principle of all constitutional rights and which is recognized by international instruments.El presente trabajo de investigación fija su norte en escudriñar los tratamientos doctrinarios y jurisprudenciales de la ejecución de la pena, deteniéndose en los criterios ideológicos de la administrativización de la ejecución de las penas, especialmente las que, corresponden a las privativas de la libertad, propios de un Estado, premoderno que propicia el ejercicio abusivo del poder disciplinario de la autoridad administrativa penitenciaria y que, deja de lado el ejercicio de los derechos de los autores del delito, no comprometidos por la ley y la naturaleza de la sentencia impuesta, como también de sus derechos fundamentales que, la constitución y los tratados internacionales lo reconocen y lo protegen; llegando a la conclusión su ilegal aplicación dentro de un Estado democrático de derecho que, exige e impone al Estado la judicialización de la ejecución de la pena, a través del juez de ejecución penal como herramienta jurisdiccional que, efectivice la protección de la libertad y dignidad humana del condenado que, constituye el principio superior de todos los derechos constitucionales y que, los instrumentos internacionales lo reconocen. Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres2024-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973Vox Juris; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2025); 25-38Vox Juris; Vol. 43 Núm. 1 (2025); 25-382521-52801812-6804reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973/3700https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973/3701Derechos de autor 2024 Elizabeth Rosmery Huamán García http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/29732024-11-29T15:48:23Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
EL JUEZ DE EJECUCIÓN PENAL Y LA EFECTIVIZACIÓN DE LOS BENEFICIOS PENITENCIARIOS
title THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
spellingShingle THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
Huamán García , Elizabeth Rosmery
title_short THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
title_full THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
title_fullStr THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
title_full_unstemmed THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
title_sort THE CRIMINAL EXECUTION JUDGE AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PENITENTIARY BENEFITS
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Huamán García , Elizabeth Rosmery
Huamán García , Elizabeth Rosmery
author Huamán García , Elizabeth Rosmery
author_facet Huamán García , Elizabeth Rosmery
author_role author
description This research seeks to scrutinize the doctrinal and jurisprudential treatments of the execution of the sentence, stopping at the ideological criteria of the administrativeization of the execution of the punishment, especially those that correspond to the deprivation of liberty, typical of a pre-modern State that favors the abusive exercise of the disciplinary power of the penitentiary administrative authority and that leaves aside the exercise of the rights of the perpetrators of the crime, not compromised by the law and the nature of the sentence imposed, as well as their fundamental rights, which the Constitution and international treaties recognize and protect; reaching the conclusion that its illegal application within a democratic State of law, which requires and imposes on the State the judicialization of the execution of the punishment, through the Criminal Execution judge as a jurisdictional tool that makes effective the protection of freedom and human dignity of the convicted person, which constitutes the superior principle of all constitutional rights and which is recognized by international instruments.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-11-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973
url https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973/3700
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2973/3701
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Elizabeth Rosmery Huamán García
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Elizabeth Rosmery Huamán García
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Vox Juris; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2025); 25-38
Vox Juris; Vol. 43 Núm. 1 (2025); 25-38
2521-5280
1812-6804
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron:USMP
instname_str Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron_str USMP
institution USMP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
collection Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1853859093656109056
score 12.818822
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).