METHODOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF JOURNALS WITH HIGH IMPACT FACTOR ACCORDING TO THE SUMMARY AND TRAINING CHARACTER

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of study was to evaluate the introductory methodological structure of journals with a high impact factor according to the summative and formative nature. The percentage of application was estimated according to the following character: summative, formative, comprehensive, scientific and chec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: ARGOTA PÉREZ, George
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/3576
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Scientia/article/view/3576
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Character - evaluation - impact factor - scientific publication
Carácter - evaluación - factor de impacto - publicación científica
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of study was to evaluate the introductory methodological structure of journals with a high impact factor according to the summative and formative nature. The percentage of application was estimated according to the following character: summative, formative, comprehensive, scientific and check-evaluative for the last four volumes of five journals with different approaches (Biomedical Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Food y Nutrition, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Research y Reviews: Journal of Educational Studies). Each character was assigned the 25% score before the interpretation of being manifested in the published scientific articles excluding the check-evaluative character due to the fact that it was assumed as the evaluation form that the reviewers should follow, varying the same among the journals. 5% was assigned among the methodological structures: introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion and conclusions. It was observed that the  number of articles published among the numbers of the journals were: 18, 16, 16, 14 and 16 where the order of character corresponded to: scientific> comprehensive> summative> formative. The character by methodological structures was: scientific and comprehensive (introduction), comprehensive (materials and methods), results (scientific, comprehensive), discussion (scientific, comprehensive, and summative) and conclusions (summative, formative).
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).