SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION?
Descripción del Articulo
The aim of the study was to describe social bioethics during the COVID-19 pandemic and their use or removal of masks after vaccination. Th e study was carried out in August 2021 where 97 people (45 men and 52 women) residing in the cities of Ica, Puno and Tacna (Peru) were selected through an intent...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
| Institución: | Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4319 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | contagio control de infecciones respiratorias distanciamiento social protección facial contagion face protection respiratory infection control social distancing |
| id |
REVURP_876764ee2f654b76fedc25e7ebeae5c9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4319 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVURP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION?BIOÉTICA SOCIAL DURANTE LA PANDEMIA COVID-19: ¿USAR O RETIRAR MASCARILLAS DESPUÉS DE LA VACUNACIÓN?Argota-Pérez, GeorgeÁlvarez-Becerra, Rina MaríaVelásquez-Salcedo, Lida FlorCcahuana-Gonzales, Mery LuzCcahuana-Gonzales, Elvis JesusCastro-Geldres, Carina LuzReyes-Ruíz, Ayda LilianaUlloa-Baca, Santos ElizabethMendoza-Yáñez, César AugustoNegrete-Tasayco, Juliana Cinthiacontagiocontrol de infecciones respiratoriasdistanciamiento socialprotección facialcontagionface protectionrespiratory infection controlsocial distancingThe aim of the study was to describe social bioethics during the COVID-19 pandemic and their use or removal of masks after vaccination. Th e study was carried out in August 2021 where 97 people (45 men and 52 women) residing in the cities of Ica, Puno and Tacna (Peru) were selected through an intentional non-probabilistic sampling and for which they showed a second vaccine dose administered against COVID-19. Four age class intervals were established: I) 45-50, II) 51-55, III) 56-60, and IV) 61-65; these were diff erentiated by sex and in which they were asked the following: “If you are vaccinated, do you think you should use the mask? Yes __ No __”. “Do you wear a double mask on public roads or in public spaces? Yes __ No __”. “Do you frequently eat food in public places with your family? Yes __ No __”. Likewise, the relationship between wearing and removing the mask by sex was as follows: men (yes = 24; no = 21), women (yes = 35; no = 17) where in both sexes it was indicated that wearing the mask is the preference. The proportion for both sexes was: men = 1.1 and women = 2.1. It is concluded that the action of being vaccinated does not argue to remove the mask and thus it was observed from the greater preference of its use as a means of protection in men and women from 45 to 65 years old, which showed social bioethics for the care of human health.El objetivo del estudio fue describir, la bioética social durante la pandemia COVID-19 y su uso o retiro de las mascarillas después de la vacunación. El estudio se realizó en agosto de 2021 donde se seleccionó mediante un muestreo no probabilístico intencional, 97 personas (45 hombres y 52 mujeres) que residen en las ciudades de Ica, Puno y Tacna (Perú) y para lo cual, mostraron una segunda administración de dosis vacunal contra la COVID-19. Se estableció, cuatro intervalos de clases de edades: I) 45-50, II) 51-55, III) 56-60, y IV) 61-65, diferenciados por sexo donde se les preguntó lo siguiente: “¿Si usted, está vacunado (a), cree que debería usar la mascarilla? Si __ No __” “¿Usa usted, doble mascarilla en las vías públicas o en espacios públicos? Si __ No __” “¿Con frecuencia consume alimentos en lugares públicos con su familia? Si __ No __”. Asimismo, la relación entre usar y retirar la mascarilla por sexo correspondió a: hombres (si = 24; no = 21), mujeres (si = 35; no = 17) donde en ambos sexos se indicó, que usar la mascarilla es la preferencia. La proporción para ambos sexos fue: hombres = 1,1 y mujeres = 2,1. Se concluye, que la acción de vacunarse, no argumenta retirarse la mascarilla y así se observó desde la preferencia mayor para su uso como medio de protección en hombres y mujeres desde los 45 hasta 65 años lo cual mostró, una bioética social para el cuidado de la salud humana.Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma2021-10-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/431910.31381/biotempo.v18i2.4319Biotempo; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2021): Biotempo; 177-1812519-56971992-215910.31381/biotempo.v18i2reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palmainstname:Universidad Ricardo Palmainstacron:URPspahttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319/5285http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319/8103Derechos de autor 2021 Biotempoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/43192023-02-28T07:00:38Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? BIOÉTICA SOCIAL DURANTE LA PANDEMIA COVID-19: ¿USAR O RETIRAR MASCARILLAS DESPUÉS DE LA VACUNACIÓN? |
| title |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? |
| spellingShingle |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? Argota-Pérez, George contagio control de infecciones respiratorias distanciamiento social protección facial contagion face protection respiratory infection control social distancing |
| title_short |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? |
| title_full |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? |
| title_fullStr |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? |
| title_sort |
SOCIAL BIOETHICS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OR REMOVE MASKS AFTER VACCINATION? |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Argota-Pérez, George Álvarez-Becerra, Rina María Velásquez-Salcedo, Lida Flor Ccahuana-Gonzales, Mery Luz Ccahuana-Gonzales, Elvis Jesus Castro-Geldres, Carina Luz Reyes-Ruíz, Ayda Liliana Ulloa-Baca, Santos Elizabeth Mendoza-Yáñez, César Augusto Negrete-Tasayco, Juliana Cinthia |
| author |
Argota-Pérez, George |
| author_facet |
Argota-Pérez, George Álvarez-Becerra, Rina María Velásquez-Salcedo, Lida Flor Ccahuana-Gonzales, Mery Luz Ccahuana-Gonzales, Elvis Jesus Castro-Geldres, Carina Luz Reyes-Ruíz, Ayda Liliana Ulloa-Baca, Santos Elizabeth Mendoza-Yáñez, César Augusto Negrete-Tasayco, Juliana Cinthia |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Álvarez-Becerra, Rina María Velásquez-Salcedo, Lida Flor Ccahuana-Gonzales, Mery Luz Ccahuana-Gonzales, Elvis Jesus Castro-Geldres, Carina Luz Reyes-Ruíz, Ayda Liliana Ulloa-Baca, Santos Elizabeth Mendoza-Yáñez, César Augusto Negrete-Tasayco, Juliana Cinthia |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
contagio control de infecciones respiratorias distanciamiento social protección facial contagion face protection respiratory infection control social distancing |
| topic |
contagio control de infecciones respiratorias distanciamiento social protección facial contagion face protection respiratory infection control social distancing |
| description |
The aim of the study was to describe social bioethics during the COVID-19 pandemic and their use or removal of masks after vaccination. Th e study was carried out in August 2021 where 97 people (45 men and 52 women) residing in the cities of Ica, Puno and Tacna (Peru) were selected through an intentional non-probabilistic sampling and for which they showed a second vaccine dose administered against COVID-19. Four age class intervals were established: I) 45-50, II) 51-55, III) 56-60, and IV) 61-65; these were diff erentiated by sex and in which they were asked the following: “If you are vaccinated, do you think you should use the mask? Yes __ No __”. “Do you wear a double mask on public roads or in public spaces? Yes __ No __”. “Do you frequently eat food in public places with your family? Yes __ No __”. Likewise, the relationship between wearing and removing the mask by sex was as follows: men (yes = 24; no = 21), women (yes = 35; no = 17) where in both sexes it was indicated that wearing the mask is the preference. The proportion for both sexes was: men = 1.1 and women = 2.1. It is concluded that the action of being vaccinated does not argue to remove the mask and thus it was observed from the greater preference of its use as a means of protection in men and women from 45 to 65 years old, which showed social bioethics for the care of human health. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319 10.31381/biotempo.v18i2.4319 |
| url |
http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.31381/biotempo.v18i2.4319 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319/5285 http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Biotempo/article/view/4319/8103 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Biotempo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Biotempo |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Biotempo; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2021): Biotempo; 177-181 2519-5697 1992-2159 10.31381/biotempo.v18i2 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma instname:Universidad Ricardo Palma instacron:URP |
| instname_str |
Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| instacron_str |
URP |
| institution |
URP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1789625159355727872 |
| score |
13.938568 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).