Application of artificial neural networks for binary detection of red eye syndrome

Descripción del Articulo

Red eye syndrome is one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in primary care, and its early diagnosis is challenging due to the clinical similarity among different etiologies. In this study, a binary detection approach (“red eye” vs. “normal”) was developed and evaluated by comparing convol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Torres Villanueva, Marcelino, Santos Fernández, Juan Pedro
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2026
Institución:Universidad Privada de Tacna
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.upt.edu.pe:article/1400
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1400
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Hiperemia ocular
Aprendizaje profundo
visión computacional
clasificación binaria
ocular hyperemia
deep learning
computer vision
binary classification
Descripción
Sumario:Red eye syndrome is one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in primary care, and its early diagnosis is challenging due to the clinical similarity among different etiologies. In this study, a binary detection approach (“red eye” vs. “normal”) was developed and evaluated by comparing convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, Transformer-based models, and a hybrid model. A dataset of 2,298 images reorganized into two classes was used and trained under homogeneous conditions using transfer learning and fixed hyperparameters. The experiments were conducted in Python 3.10.0 using PyTorch 2.7.1+cu118, torchvision 0.22.1+cu118, timm 1.0.17, scikit-learn 1.6.1, NumPy 1.26.4, Albumentations 2.0.8, and Matplotlib 3.8.2, on hardware equipped with an NVIDIA RTX 4060 GPU (8 GB). The results showed high performance across all evaluated models (F1 > 0.92, MCC > 0.90, and AUC ≥ 0.98). The hybrid model achieved the best overall performance (AUC = 0.996, MCC = 0.925, F1 = 0.924, and accuracy = 94.20%). McNemar’s test indicated no statistically significant differences between the hybrid model and the best-performing individual model (ResNet).
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).