The reduction of the age of criminal responsibility in debate: Uruguay y Brasil (2012 y 2016)

Descripción del Articulo

This article presents a comparative study of the contexts and factors that led to the resurgence of proposals for lowering the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years, in Uruguay and Brazil, in the period from 2012 to 2016. It is possible to identify regional dynamics of criminalization o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Rodríguez Ravera, Tania
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Privada de Tacna
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.upt.edu.pe:article/360
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/arquitek/article/view/360
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:América del Sur
Sistemas penales juveniles
Punitivismo
Racismo
Encarcelamiento
: South America
Juvenile criminal systems
Punitivism
Racism
Imprisonment
Descripción
Sumario:This article presents a comparative study of the contexts and factors that led to the resurgence of proposals for lowering the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years, in Uruguay and Brazil, in the period from 2012 to 2016. It is possible to identify regional dynamics of criminalization of poverty and youth taking as variables of study: the increase in the rates of youth imprisonment, mainly adolescents, and the criminal upsurge through more punitive policies and legislation (punitive advance). Greater attention is given to the socio-historical-cultural aspects of these dynamics and to the relations established between politics and penalty in a context of neoliberal hegemony. The central matter is: why are similar proposals made for contexts that, apparently, are different? Therefore it is proposed to identify and understand how these processes occur, the continuities and discontinuities with their past, and verify that they are not reduced exclusively to internal dynamics of "national tissues" but are due, in a certain way, to their own history and regional reality. The time frame of this thesis is between 2012 and 2016, taking as a reference the strong (re)start of the debate in Uruguay through the approval of a constitutional plebiscite to lower the age of imputability, and the reopening of the process in Brazil in 2015 with a similar proposal (which is still under discussion in the Brazilian parliament).
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).