Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase

Descripción del Articulo

The study aimed to compare the accuracy of tests or methods for counting engorged ticks in cows reared under extensive production systems. In total, 49 adult cows of the Criollo Ñeembucú, Brown Swiss, Brangus and Nelore genotypes were used during the summer in March 2019. Several body regions were r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rodríguez, María Inés, Martínez, Roberto, Núñez, Lorena
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/18802
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/18802
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:ectoparasites
bovines
palpatory method
indirect visual method
ectoparásitos
bovinos
método palpatorio
método visual indirecto
id REVUNMSM_fa30bcb2fbdabf43691341cadf3ecded
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/18802
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phaseEvaluación de metodologías para recuento de garrapatas en fase de vida parásitaRodríguez, María InésMartínez, Roberto Núñez, Lorena Rodríguez, María InésMartínez, Roberto Núñez, Lorena ectoparasitesbovinespalpatory methodindirect visual methodectoparásitosbovinosmétodo palpatoriométodo visual indirectoThe study aimed to compare the accuracy of tests or methods for counting engorged ticks in cows reared under extensive production systems. In total, 49 adult cows of the Criollo Ñeembucú, Brown Swiss, Brangus and Nelore genotypes were used during the summer in March 2019. Several body regions were reviewed sequentially using the indirect visual method, palpatory and finally the direct method, defined the latter as the gold standard. To estimate the validity and reliability indicators, comparison of the behavior of the receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) and concordance tests, the Epidat 3.1 program for epidemiological analysis of tabulated data was used. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were markedly higher for the palpatory test. The poor value of the Kappa index revealed that the agreement between the indirect and direct visual method was due to random (p=0.2097). In the palpatory method, the ROC curve showed a larger area compared to the indirect visual method. The results of the homogeneity test of the ROC areas revealed that the difference in the efficacy of both tests was highly significant (p<0.01), proving the limited usefulness of the indirect visual method applied to the count of engorged ticks in the parasitic phase, as opposed to the palpatory method.El estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar la exactitud de las pruebas o métodos de recuento de garrapatas ingurgitadas en hembras bovinas criadas bajo sistemas de producción extensiva. Se utilizaron 49 vacas adultas de los genotipos Criollo Ñeembucú, Pardo Suizo, Brangus y Nelore durante el estío en marzo de 2019. Se revisaron varias regiones corporales de manera secuencial mediante el método visual indirecto, palpatorio y finalmente el método directo, definido este último como patrón de referencia o gold standard. Para la estimación de los indicadores de validez y fiabilidad, comparación del comportamiento de las curvas de características operacionales del receptor (ROC) y pruebas de concordancia se recurrió al programa para análisis epidemiológico de datos tabulados Epidat 3.1. La sensibilidad y el valor predictivo negativo fueron marcadamente superiores para la prueba palpatoria. El deficiente valor del índice Kappa reveló que el acuerdo entre el método visual indirecto y directo fue debido al azar (p= 0.2097). En el método palpatorio, la curva ROC mostró un área mayor en comparación con el método visual indirecto. Los resultados de la prueba de homogeneidad de las áreas ROC revelaron que la diferencia en cuanto a la eficacia de ambas pruebas fue altamente significativa (p˂0.01), pudiéndose constatar la poca utilidad del método visual indirecto aplicado al recuento de garrapatas ingurgitadas en fase parásita, no así del método palpatorio.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2021-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1880210.15381/rivep.v32i3.18802Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 Núm. 3 (2021); e18802Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2021); e188021682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/18802/16814Derechos de autor 2021 María Inés Rodríguez, Roberto Martínez, Lorena Núñezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/188022021-06-25T10:32:50Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
Evaluación de metodologías para recuento de garrapatas en fase de vida parásita
title Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
spellingShingle Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
Rodríguez, María Inés
ectoparasites
bovines
palpatory method
indirect visual method
ectoparásitos
bovinos
método palpatorio
método visual indirecto
title_short Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
title_full Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
title_fullStr Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
title_sort Evaluation of methodologies for counting of ticks in the parasitic life phase
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez, María Inés
Martínez, Roberto
Núñez, Lorena
Rodríguez, María Inés
Martínez, Roberto
Núñez, Lorena
author Rodríguez, María Inés
author_facet Rodríguez, María Inés
Martínez, Roberto
Núñez, Lorena
author_role author
author2 Martínez, Roberto
Núñez, Lorena
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ectoparasites
bovines
palpatory method
indirect visual method
ectoparásitos
bovinos
método palpatorio
método visual indirecto
topic ectoparasites
bovines
palpatory method
indirect visual method
ectoparásitos
bovinos
método palpatorio
método visual indirecto
description The study aimed to compare the accuracy of tests or methods for counting engorged ticks in cows reared under extensive production systems. In total, 49 adult cows of the Criollo Ñeembucú, Brown Swiss, Brangus and Nelore genotypes were used during the summer in March 2019. Several body regions were reviewed sequentially using the indirect visual method, palpatory and finally the direct method, defined the latter as the gold standard. To estimate the validity and reliability indicators, comparison of the behavior of the receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) and concordance tests, the Epidat 3.1 program for epidemiological analysis of tabulated data was used. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were markedly higher for the palpatory test. The poor value of the Kappa index revealed that the agreement between the indirect and direct visual method was due to random (p=0.2097). In the palpatory method, the ROC curve showed a larger area compared to the indirect visual method. The results of the homogeneity test of the ROC areas revealed that the difference in the efficacy of both tests was highly significant (p<0.01), proving the limited usefulness of the indirect visual method applied to the count of engorged ticks in the parasitic phase, as opposed to the palpatory method.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/18802
10.15381/rivep.v32i3.18802
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/18802
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v32i3.18802
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/18802/16814
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 María Inés Rodríguez, Roberto Martínez, Lorena Núñez
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 María Inés Rodríguez, Roberto Martínez, Lorena Núñez
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 Núm. 3 (2021); e18802
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2021); e18802
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238234186317824
score 13.7211075
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).