Effect of the combination of materials for inclusion at different pressures on the mobility of artificial teeth during prosthetic processing

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: Compare the artificial teeth changes position in the maxillary total prosthesis at the time of pressing, by measuring at certain pre-determined reference points, under different types of pressure force of 800, 1 000 and 1 250 kg, using Type III gypsum (Whip Mix, USA®) and condensation sil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Jaramillo Ruiz, Letty Cecibel, Armas Vega, Ana del Carmen, Rodríguez Villarreal, Juan Pablo, Banderas Benítez, Valeria Elizabeth, Chávez Campuzano, María Fernanda, Naranjo Izurieta, Jorge Augusto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/15558
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/15558
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Materiales dentales
Movilidad dentaria
Prostodoncia
Dental materials
Prosthodontics
Tooth mobility
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: Compare the artificial teeth changes position in the maxillary total prosthesis at the time of pressing, by measuring at certain pre-determined reference points, under different types of pressure force of 800, 1 000 and 1 250 kg, using Type III gypsum (Whip Mix, USA®) and condensation silicone (Zhermack, Italy) as inclusion materials. Methods: 36 superior prostheses obtained from a plaster model of a single total edentulous patient were fabricated. The copies were randomly divided into 6 groups each with 6 repetitions, considering the involved variables, materials and evaluiated strength after press and process of being transformed in acrylic. The difference between the reference points was established by Autocad (21.2 version Autodesk, Spain). Results: significant difference was detected between silicone and gypsum at 1 000 force at 1% of significance level. Conclusions: Standing out more stability in terms of movement when used silicone as material for inclusion, with better results when using under 1 000 kg pressure force, independent of the pressure tested in all samples there was movement in the artificial teeth original position
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).