Discursive representation of war in personal letters sent during the Malvinas War

Descripción del Articulo

On April 2, 1982, the Malvinas War began, in which Argentina confronted the United Kingdom to recover the Malvinas Islands. It occurred within the framework of the last military dictatorship, so that the dictatorship and the war are intertwined in social memory (Guber, 2001; Lorenz, 2009). The objec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Carrizo, Alicia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/24030
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/24030
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Guerra de Malvinas
cartas personales
estrategias discursivas
argumentación
posicionamiento
Malvinas’s War
personal letters
discursive strategies
argumentation
positioning
Guerra das Malvinas
cartas pessoais
estratégias discursivas
argumentação
posicionamento
Descripción
Sumario:On April 2, 1982, the Malvinas War began, in which Argentina confronted the United Kingdom to recover the Malvinas Islands. It occurred within the framework of the last military dictatorship, so that the dictatorship and the war are intertwined in social memory (Guber, 2001; Lorenz, 2009). The objective is to study the discursive representation of the war in personal letters written on the battle front in order to make the voice of the soldiers visible. We focus, in particular, on the available meanings activated by the protagonists in relation to their participation in the conflict. The analysis of the texts takes systemic functional linguistics (Halliday, 1982, 1985) as a base theory. It also integrates the analysis of argumentation (Carrizo, 2012, 2019) and the structures of participation and interactional positioning (Goffman, 1974, 1981) from the perspective of strategic discourse analysis (Menéndez 2019), and critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 2003; Pardo, 2008). Preliminary results show strategies that circumvent the differences between protagonists in pursuit of the shared experience that legitimizes participation.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).