‘Copy and paste’ in undergraduate research: abusing Internet

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: ethics in the research process is an issue little discussed during the undergraduate and therefore should be analyzed to prevent breaches that could affect the development of the researcher in training. Design: Retrospective observational study. Lugar: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Huamaní, Charles, Dulanto Pizzorni, Andrés, Rojas Revoredo, Verónica
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2013
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1154
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/1154
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Ética en investigación
plagio
estudiantes de medicina
investigación universitaria.
Ethics
research
plagiarism
students
medical
university research. INTRODUCCIÓN El plagio es el uso para fines propios
de ideas de otros trabajos publicados o no publicados no citados
en algunos casos redactados en diferentes idiomas (1)
o es simple
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: ethics in the research process is an issue little discussed during the undergraduate and therefore should be analyzed to prevent breaches that could affect the development of the researcher in training. Design: Retrospective observational study. Lugar: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Population: Section of the ‘introduction’ of research works conducted in 2004 in a course curriculum. Interventions: Manually reviewed the prayers of the ‘introduction’ of works, describes the type of copy, the number of works, authors, consultants, copied paragraphs, and the type of information sources and copying. Principal outcome measures: frequencies and percentages of prayers copied and type of copy. Results: It reviewed a total of 24 research papers, with an average of 6 authors and 2 advisers for work, 23 had some evidence of electronic copy, only 8 were literal copies; of the total prayers reviewed, 64% corresponds to complete copy of prayers; only 30% of the sources were copied scientific publications online, other sources were copied publicly available non-specialists. Conclusions: describes a high frequency of copy during the undergraduate research from electronic sources, so it is necessary to prevent its recurrence in future research and implement systems systematic search for plagiarism.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).