SYSTEM OF EVALUATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT PLANS. MASTER PLAN CASE OF MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION OF KUELAP AND ITS ENVIRONMENT
Descripción del Articulo
There appears the system of evaluation of archaeological monuments developed for the Main Plan of Handling and Conservation of Kuelap and his environment (PMK) in 2003. The importance of the article resides in the possibility of including new descriptive parameters of archaeological patrimony in fun...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2009 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/12421 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/Arqueo/article/view/12421 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | System of evaluation of archaeological monuments cultural management plans of handling Kuelap Utcubamba agroarqueological areas. Sistema de valoración de monumentos arqueológicos gestión cultural planes de manejo áreas agroarqueológicas. |
Sumario: | There appears the system of evaluation of archaeological monuments developed for the Main Plan of Handling and Conservation of Kuelap and his environment (PMK) in 2003. The importance of the article resides in the possibility of including new descriptive parameters of archaeological patrimony in function to the need to develop plans of management that guarantee his conservation and that regulate the interventions that in them are realized. There appear the methodological aspects of the used system of evaluation and his principal results in figures and graphs detailed for the discussion about the validity of the method, taking into consideration that there do not exist previous references to the system used in Peru. The article presents the identified places, the arranging of the information and the qualification of the places based on his limitations, potentials and the required activities, the establishment of the Geohistorical Units (UGH), and the development of plan of interventions prioritized by every place and UGH. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).