Myth versus reality in the payment for hydrological ecosystem services: the case of Peru

• Autor: Postigo De la Motta, William
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2023
• Institución: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
• Repositorio: Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/25713
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/econo/article/view/25713
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Environmental Policy; economic instruments; Payment for ecosystem services; Política Ambiental; instrumentos económicos; Pago por servicios ecosistémicos

Payment for Hydrological Ecosystem Services – PHES is presented as a market mechanism where two parts voluntarily agree, one, to recognize an ecosystem service provision and to pay for it, and the other one to receive this payment under the commitment to preserve the forest cover upstream, ensuring ecosystem services such as higher water availability and lower sediment content for the water users downstream. However, PHES application in Peru, firstly, does not warrant that the supposed benefits are really obtained, since no adequate monitoring has been carried out. And, secondly, the Peruvian experience clearly shows that PHES is not a market mechanism, as the conceptual foundations pretend, but in practice requires strong support from the government. In addition, it is observed that revenue collection is poor enough as not to become sufficient to induce the required behavioral change. On the contrary, implementation of this mechanism is costly and no cost-benefit analysis has been done to ensure that the high costs involved are justified with the benefits gained.