Corrective feedback in collaborative narrative writing for English as a second language learning in university students
Descripción del Articulo
According to the trends observed in the literature, studies related to corrective feedback are mostly quantitative and generally aim to compare the effectiveness of different ways of using it. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of student teachers of English regarding the delivery...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/29234 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/29234 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | feedback escritura colaboración aprendizaje inglés writing collaboration learning English escrita colaboração aprendizagem inglês |
| Sumario: | According to the trends observed in the literature, studies related to corrective feedback are mostly quantitative and generally aim to compare the effectiveness of different ways of using it. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of student teachers of English regarding the delivery of written corrective feedback through the collaborative writing of narrative texts. The methodology applied corresponded to a qualitative research approach, using the phenomenology method by applying and analyzing semi-structured interviews with 12 first-year English teaching students from a Chilean university. These were conducted after a 5-session pedagogical intervention that included corrective feedback and collaborative writing strategies mediated by technological resources. The findings suggest that metalinguistic corrective feedback is necessary, since it helps to reinforce grammatical knowledge of English, and some participants also believe that its delivery should be regulated according to the level of knowledge or the number of instances of written activities. Therefore, based on these appreciations, the importance of exploring the types of feedback that students need according to the context in which they find themselves stands out. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).