Critical Evaluation of the Ultrsdonographic Biophysical Profile Score, Their Interpretation and Value. Hospital Guillermo Almenara, Lima-Perú
Descripción del Articulo
OBJECTIVES: To make a critical evaluation of the performance of Ultrasonographic Biophysical Profile (UBP) as a method for antepartum fetal evaluation; to define their main outcome measures as well as their interpretation, and propose a fetal well-being assessment algorithm which considers the score...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 1999 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/4450 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/4450 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Utrasonography Fetus Prenatal Care Pregnancy Ultrasonografía Feto Atención Prenatal Embarazo |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: To make a critical evaluation of the performance of Ultrasonographic Biophysical Profile (UBP) as a method for antepartum fetal evaluation; to define their main outcome measures as well as their interpretation, and propose a fetal well-being assessment algorithm which considers the score obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, prospective blind study. Since october, 1997 to september, 1998, 120 women with a gestational age ³28 weeks who required fetal well-being assessment to decide pregnancy interruption, at the High-Risk-Obstetrics Department, Hospital Guillermo Almenara, Lima. We evaluate the difficulties and benefits obtained with the ultrasonographic assessment of baseline fetal heart rate and heart reactivity; and the value of ultrasonographic qualitative assessment of amniotic fluid volume, placentary senescence and early placentary aging; and the value of establishing a cutpoint to define high risk pregnancies. RESULTS: Using this way, UBP showed an high sensitivity (87,5%), a good predictive value (63,6%) and an important decrease of false positive and false negative results (36,3% and 2,0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Used in conjunction with a fetal well-being assessment algorithm and with an individualized approach to each woman, UBP was efficient and effective. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).