Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods
Descripción del Articulo
The aim of this study was to compare the direct method with the precipitation method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in a species with a metabolic HDL pattern. Blood samples were taken from 56 dairy cows early in the day. The LDL cholesterol levels were determined in the serum by both metho...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14088 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | LDL cholesterol cattle direct method precipitation method colesterol LDL bovinos método directo método de precipitación |
| id |
REVUNMSM_48336a20a37a6689c7a41f21526c7f44 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14088 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methodsDeterminación de los niveles de colesterol LDL en ganado bovino comparando dos métodosOsorio, José HenryCastañeda, Jorge AbelLDL cholesterolcattledirect methodprecipitation methodcolesterol LDLbovinosmétodo directométodo de precipitaciónThe aim of this study was to compare the direct method with the precipitation method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in a species with a metabolic HDL pattern. Blood samples were taken from 56 dairy cows early in the day. The LDL cholesterol levels were determined in the serum by both methods using commercial kits. The results were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance. The direct method reported values (mg/dl) of 46.66, 6.50, 101.83, 95.33 and 24.15 for average, minimum, maximum, range and standard deviation, respectively, and using the precipitation method values (mg/dl) of 14.33, 0.36, 59.12, 58.76 and 11.21 respectively, with a statistically significant difference between these methods for a 95.0% confidence level. The results indicate that the direct method is the most reliable for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels.El objetivo del estudio fue comparar el método Directo con el método de Precipitación para la determinación de colesterol LDL en una especie con patrón metabólico HDL. Se tomaron muestras de sangre de 56 vacas lecheras a primera hora del día. Se determinaron los niveles de colesterol LDL en el suero mediante ambos métodos utilizando kits comerciales. Los resultados fueron analizados estadísticamente mediante un análisis de varianza de una vía. El método directo reportó valores en mg/dl de 46.66, 6.50, 101.83, 95.33 y 24.15 para promedio, mínimo, máximo, rango y desviación estándar, respectivamente y mediante el método de precipitación se obtuvieron valores (mg/dl) de 14.33, 0.36, 59.12, 58.76 y 11.21, respectivamente, habiendo diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre estos métodos para un nivel de confianza del 95.0%. Los resultados indican que el método directo es el más confiable para la determinación de los niveles de colesterol LDL.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2018-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1408810.15381/rivep.v29i1.14088Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2018); 126-131Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2018); 126-1311682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088/12746https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088/13986Derechos de autor 2018 José Henry Osorio, Jorge Abel Castañedahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/140882018-03-15T04:44:35Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods Determinación de los niveles de colesterol LDL en ganado bovino comparando dos métodos |
| title |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods |
| spellingShingle |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods Osorio, José Henry LDL cholesterol cattle direct method precipitation method colesterol LDL bovinos método directo método de precipitación |
| title_short |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods |
| title_full |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods |
| title_fullStr |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods |
| title_sort |
Determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle comparing two methods |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Osorio, José Henry Castañeda, Jorge Abel |
| author |
Osorio, José Henry |
| author_facet |
Osorio, José Henry Castañeda, Jorge Abel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Castañeda, Jorge Abel |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LDL cholesterol cattle direct method precipitation method colesterol LDL bovinos método directo método de precipitación |
| topic |
LDL cholesterol cattle direct method precipitation method colesterol LDL bovinos método directo método de precipitación |
| description |
The aim of this study was to compare the direct method with the precipitation method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in a species with a metabolic HDL pattern. Blood samples were taken from 56 dairy cows early in the day. The LDL cholesterol levels were determined in the serum by both methods using commercial kits. The results were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance. The direct method reported values (mg/dl) of 46.66, 6.50, 101.83, 95.33 and 24.15 for average, minimum, maximum, range and standard deviation, respectively, and using the precipitation method values (mg/dl) of 14.33, 0.36, 59.12, 58.76 and 11.21 respectively, with a statistically significant difference between these methods for a 95.0% confidence level. The results indicate that the direct method is the most reliable for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-14 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088 10.15381/rivep.v29i1.14088 |
| url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v29i1.14088 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088/12746 https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14088/13986 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 José Henry Osorio, Jorge Abel Castañeda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 José Henry Osorio, Jorge Abel Castañeda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2018); 126-131 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2018); 126-131 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| instacron_str |
UNMSM |
| institution |
UNMSM |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1795238228676050944 |
| score |
13.971837 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
