Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics
Descripción del Articulo
The value of a forage plant depends not only on its productivity but also on its acceptance and preference of the animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the forage yield, chemical composition, acceptance and preference of three forage legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Cent...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/20745 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/20745 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | animal behaviour acceptance preference legume comportamiento animal aceptación preferencia leguminosa |
id |
REVUNMSM_29d73344cbbd3d1ce54af1d2c05e6f6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/20745 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics Aceptación y preferencia animal de leguminosas (Archis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis y Centrocema macrocarpum) en el trópico |
title |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics |
spellingShingle |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics Romero Delgado, Gelver animal behaviour acceptance preference legume comportamiento animal aceptación preferencia leguminosa |
title_short |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics |
title_full |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics |
title_fullStr |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics |
title_sort |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropics |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Romero Delgado, Gelver Aguirre, Lucrecia Flores Mariazza, Enrique Ricardo Romero Delgado, Gelver Aguirre, Lucrecia Flores Mariazza, Enrique Ricardo |
author |
Romero Delgado, Gelver |
author_facet |
Romero Delgado, Gelver Aguirre, Lucrecia Flores Mariazza, Enrique Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aguirre, Lucrecia Flores Mariazza, Enrique Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
animal behaviour acceptance preference legume comportamiento animal aceptación preferencia leguminosa |
topic |
animal behaviour acceptance preference legume comportamiento animal aceptación preferencia leguminosa |
description |
The value of a forage plant depends not only on its productivity but also on its acceptance and preference of the animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the forage yield, chemical composition, acceptance and preference of three forage legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in Girolando female calves under tropical conditions. Experiment 1: Production (KgMS/h) and Nutritional Value (%) of the species from quarterly cuts and for one year after the growth phase has ended. Experiment 2: Acceptability was determined by the intake rate (g/min) of each species in six calves without experience in their consumption, when they were offered individually to the animals for 5 min daily for three consecutive days. Experiment 3: Preference was estimated from the relative intake (%) in individual pens when the three species were offered for 10 min daily for five consecutive days in individual pens and separated from each other by visual barriers to avoid interactions between animals. Yield and nutritional value varied significantly between species (p<0.001): 6019, 4057 and 1236 kg/DM/ha, crude protein 14.45, 16.32 and 16.98% and NDF 58.63, 57.51 and 50.79% in S. guianensis, C. macrocarpum and A. pintoi, respectively, while the acceptance and preference tests revealed that A. pintoi (8.18 gMS/min and 45.97%) and S. guianensis (8.14 gMS/min and 33.31%) showed greater acceptance and preference with relation to C. macrocarpum (4.52 gMS/min and 20.72%). Consequently, A. pintoi and S. guianensis provide an opportunity to supply animals with nitrogen in less time when they are supplemented in protein banks. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-27 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/20745 10.15381/rivep.v33i5.20745 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/20745 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v33i5.20745 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/20745/18765 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Gelver Romero Delgado, Lucrecia Aguirre, Enrique Ricardo Flores Mariazza http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Gelver Romero Delgado, Lucrecia Aguirre, Enrique Ricardo Flores Mariazza http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 Núm. 5 (2022); e20745 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 No. 5 (2022); e20745 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238236020277248 |
spelling |
Animal acceptance and preference of legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in the tropicsAceptación y preferencia animal de leguminosas (Archis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis y Centrocema macrocarpum) en el trópicoRomero Delgado, GelverAguirre, LucreciaFlores Mariazza, Enrique RicardoRomero Delgado, GelverAguirre, LucreciaFlores Mariazza, Enrique Ricardoanimal behaviouracceptancepreferencelegumecomportamiento animalaceptaciónpreferencialeguminosa The value of a forage plant depends not only on its productivity but also on its acceptance and preference of the animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the forage yield, chemical composition, acceptance and preference of three forage legumes (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis and Centrocema macrocarpum) in Girolando female calves under tropical conditions. Experiment 1: Production (KgMS/h) and Nutritional Value (%) of the species from quarterly cuts and for one year after the growth phase has ended. Experiment 2: Acceptability was determined by the intake rate (g/min) of each species in six calves without experience in their consumption, when they were offered individually to the animals for 5 min daily for three consecutive days. Experiment 3: Preference was estimated from the relative intake (%) in individual pens when the three species were offered for 10 min daily for five consecutive days in individual pens and separated from each other by visual barriers to avoid interactions between animals. Yield and nutritional value varied significantly between species (p<0.001): 6019, 4057 and 1236 kg/DM/ha, crude protein 14.45, 16.32 and 16.98% and NDF 58.63, 57.51 and 50.79% in S. guianensis, C. macrocarpum and A. pintoi, respectively, while the acceptance and preference tests revealed that A. pintoi (8.18 gMS/min and 45.97%) and S. guianensis (8.14 gMS/min and 33.31%) showed greater acceptance and preference with relation to C. macrocarpum (4.52 gMS/min and 20.72%). Consequently, A. pintoi and S. guianensis provide an opportunity to supply animals with nitrogen in less time when they are supplemented in protein banks.El valor de una planta forrajera depende no solo de su productividad sino también de su aceptación y preferencia por los animales. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el rendimiento forrajero, composición química, aceptación y preferencia de tres leguminosas forrajeras (Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis y Centrocema macrocarpum) en terneras Girolando en condiciones tropicales. Experimento 1: Producción (KgMS/h) y Valor Nutritivo (%) de las especies a partir de cortes trimestrales y durante un año después de culminada la fase de crecimiento. Experimento 2: Se determinó la aceptabilidad mediante la tasa de ingesta (g/min) de cada especie en seis terneras sin experiencia en el consumo de estas, cuando eran ofrecidas individuamente a los animales durante 5 min diarios por tres días consecutivos. Experimento 3: Se estimó la preferencia a partir del consumo relativo (%) en corrales individuales cuando las tres especies eran ofrecidas por 10 min diarios durante cinco días consecutivos en corrales individuales y separados entre sí por barreras visuales para evitar interacciones entre los animales. El rendimiento y valor nutritivo varió significativamente entre especies (p<0.001): 6019, 4057 y 1236 kg/MS/ha, proteína cruda 14.45, 16.32 y 16.98% y FDN 58.63, 57.51 y 50.79% en S. guianensis, C. macrocarpum y A. pintoi, respectivamente, en tanto que las pruebas de aceptación y preferencia revelaron que A. pintoi (8.18 gMS/min y 45.97%) y S. guianensis (8.14 gMS/min y 33.31%) mostraron una mayor aceptación y preferencia con relación a C. macrocarpum (4.52 gMS/min y 20.72%). En consecuencia, A. pintoi y S. guianensis proveen una oportunidad de abastecer de nitrógeno en menor tiempo a los animales cuando son suplementados en bancos de proteína.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2022-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/2074510.15381/rivep.v33i5.20745Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 Núm. 5 (2022); e20745Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 33 No. 5 (2022); e207451682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/20745/18765Derechos de autor 2022 Gelver Romero Delgado, Lucrecia Aguirre, Enrique Ricardo Flores Mariazzahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/207452022-10-28T02:28:27Z |
score |
13.95948 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).