Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador
Descripción del Articulo
The aim of this research was to describe the morphometry of the testicles and sperm of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) of two genetic groups, native and improved, from southern Ecuador. Twenty-two native and 20 improved guinea pigs of the Peru line were used. The animals were reared in elevated cages...
Autores: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17988 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17988 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | guinea pigs testis spermatozoa morphometry gonadosomatic index cuy testículo espermatozoides morfometría índice gonadosomático |
id |
REVUNMSM_264225e8740cac0c82eb2034c85d867f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17988 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador Morfometría de la gónada masculina y espermatozoides de cobayos (Cavia porcellus) nativo y mejorado del sur de Ecuador |
title |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador |
spellingShingle |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador Rosales Jaramillo, Cornelio Alejandro guinea pigs testis spermatozoa morphometry gonadosomatic index cuy testículo espermatozoides morfometría índice gonadosomático |
title_short |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador |
title_full |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador |
title_fullStr |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador |
title_full_unstemmed |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador |
title_sort |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern Ecuador |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rosales Jaramillo, Cornelio Alejandro Guevara V., Guillermo Perea G., Fernando Ayala G., Luis Nieto Escandón, Pedro |
author |
Rosales Jaramillo, Cornelio Alejandro |
author_facet |
Rosales Jaramillo, Cornelio Alejandro Guevara V., Guillermo Perea G., Fernando Ayala G., Luis Nieto Escandón, Pedro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guevara V., Guillermo Perea G., Fernando Ayala G., Luis Nieto Escandón, Pedro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
guinea pigs testis spermatozoa morphometry gonadosomatic index cuy testículo espermatozoides morfometría índice gonadosomático |
topic |
guinea pigs testis spermatozoa morphometry gonadosomatic index cuy testículo espermatozoides morfometría índice gonadosomático |
description |
The aim of this research was to describe the morphometry of the testicles and sperm of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) of two genetic groups, native and improved, from southern Ecuador. Twenty-two native and 20 improved guinea pigs of the Peru line were used. The animals were reared in elevated cages and fed with forage and concentrate, until reaching the slaughter age of 97 to 112 days. After slaughtering, the testicles and epididymis were removed, and the epididymis was separated of the testis. Measurements of the testicles were done, and sperm was collected from the epididymis by the retrograde flow washing technique. Semen smears were prepared for sperm measurements. The data were processed by GLM analysis of variance and the LSMeans procedure was used to compare the means (SAS v. 9.0). The morphometric parameters of the testes were different (p<0.05) between subpopulations. Opposite testes from the same genetic group were similar, while the ipsilateral ones between subpopulations showed statistical differences (p<0.05). Testicular size was directly related to body weight, and the gonadosomatic index of native guinea pigs was higher than that of improved ones (p<0.05). Spermatozoa were different (p<0.05) between genetic groups in acrosome and head length and in head length / width ratio. In conclusion, this study showed morphological differences in the testes and sperm between the two genetic groups of guinea pigs. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-22 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17988 10.15381/rivep.v32i2.17988 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17988 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v32i2.17988 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17988/16542 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 Núm. 2 (2021); e17988 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2021); e17988 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238233420857344 |
spelling |
Morphometry of the male gonad and sperm of native and improved guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) from southern EcuadorMorfometría de la gónada masculina y espermatozoides de cobayos (Cavia porcellus) nativo y mejorado del sur de EcuadorRosales Jaramillo, Cornelio AlejandroGuevara V., GuillermoPerea G., FernandoAyala G., LuisNieto Escandón, Pedroguinea pigstestisspermatozoamorphometrygonadosomatic indexcuytestículoespermatozoidesmorfometríaíndice gonadosomáticoThe aim of this research was to describe the morphometry of the testicles and sperm of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) of two genetic groups, native and improved, from southern Ecuador. Twenty-two native and 20 improved guinea pigs of the Peru line were used. The animals were reared in elevated cages and fed with forage and concentrate, until reaching the slaughter age of 97 to 112 days. After slaughtering, the testicles and epididymis were removed, and the epididymis was separated of the testis. Measurements of the testicles were done, and sperm was collected from the epididymis by the retrograde flow washing technique. Semen smears were prepared for sperm measurements. The data were processed by GLM analysis of variance and the LSMeans procedure was used to compare the means (SAS v. 9.0). The morphometric parameters of the testes were different (p<0.05) between subpopulations. Opposite testes from the same genetic group were similar, while the ipsilateral ones between subpopulations showed statistical differences (p<0.05). Testicular size was directly related to body weight, and the gonadosomatic index of native guinea pigs was higher than that of improved ones (p<0.05). Spermatozoa were different (p<0.05) between genetic groups in acrosome and head length and in head length / width ratio. In conclusion, this study showed morphological differences in the testes and sperm between the two genetic groups of guinea pigs.El objetivo de esta investigación fue describir la morfometría de los testículos y espermatozoides de cuyes (Cavia porcellus) de dos grupos genéticos, nativos y mejorados, del sur de Ecuador. Se utilizaron 22 cuyes nativos y 20 mejorados de la línea Perú, los cuales fueron criados en jaulas elevadas y alimentados con forraje y concentrado, hasta alcanzar la edad de sacrificio de 97 a 112 días. Luego de faenados, se retiraron los testículos y epidídimos, y mediante disección se separó el epidídimo del testículo para tomar sus dimensiones, y recolectar los espermatozoides del epidídimo por la técnica de lavado por flujo retrógrado. Se prepararon frotis de semen para las mediciones de espermatozoides. Los datos se procesaron por análisis de varianza GLM y se utilizó el procedimiento LSMeans para comparar las medias (SAS V.9.0). Los parámetros morfométricos de los testículos fueron diferentes (p<0.05) entre subpoblaciones; testículos opuestos del mismo grupo genético fueron similares, mientras que los ipsilaterales entre subpoblaciones mostraron diferencias estadísticas (p<0.05). El tamaño testicular tuvo relación directa con el peso corporal, y el índice gonadosomático de los cuyes nativos fue mayor que el de los mejorados (p<0.05). Los espermatozoides fueron diferentes (p<0.05) entre grupos genéticos en la longitud del acrosoma y cabeza y en la relación longitud/ancho de cabeza. En conclusión, se encontraron diferencias morfológicas en los testículos y en los espermatozoides entre los dos grupos de cuyes.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2021-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1798810.15381/rivep.v32i2.17988Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 Núm. 2 (2021); e17988Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2021); e179881682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/17988/16542Derechos de autor 2021 Cornelio Alejandro Rosales Jaramillo, Guillermo Guevara V., Fernando Perea G., Luis Ayala G., Pedro Nieto Escandónhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/179882021-04-26T16:41:35Z |
score |
13.927358 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).