Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions

Descripción del Articulo

The objective of the study was to evaluate the human-animal interaction (HAI) and the handling practices at a livestock market in Medellin, Colombia. Data was collected at four livestock auctions in June 2014. A total of 720 bovines were distributed into 241 and 28 groups during the weighing and dri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Herrán, Lucia, Romero, Marlyn, Herrán, Lorena
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/13360
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13360
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:animal welfare
interactions
behavioral responses
handlers
bienestar animal
interacciones
respuestas conductuales
manejadores
id REVUNMSM_1d60ed888593c18495c6a5e1b3bbe801
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/13360
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctionsInteracción Humano-Animal y Prácticas de Manejo Bovino en Subastas ColombianasHerrán, LuciaRomero, MarlynHerrán, Lorenaanimal welfareinteractionsbehavioral responseshandlersbienestar animalinteraccionesrespuestas conductualesmanejadoresThe objective of the study was to evaluate the human-animal interaction (HAI) and the handling practices at a livestock market in Medellin, Colombia. Data was collected at four livestock auctions in June 2014. A total of 720 bovines were distributed into 241 and 28 groups during the weighing and driving to the corral respectively. Findings during the veterinary inspection, as well as tactile, auditory and visual interactions of cattle handlers and behavioral responses of cattle were evaluated. In the veterinary inspection, 19.5% of the groups were observed, especially due to open wounds (38.3%). In the weighing area, there were 824 interactions, predominantly visual (44.1%) and then tactile (30.1%) and auditory (25.8%); however, 73.0, 66.4 and 88.4% of the animals had no behavioral response to visual, tactile and auditory interactions, respectively. Twenty-four interactions were recorded during driving to corrals, with tactile predominance (42.5%) over auditory (30.8%) and visual (26.6%); however, most of the groups presented only behavioral response to tactile interactions (68%). Positive handling interactions such as whistling, waving the instrument, and raising hands generated few behavioral responses and quieter animal handling. On the other hand, hitting, punching, and screaming provoked greater reactivity and agonistic behaviors in the animals.El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar las interacciones humano-animal (IHA) y las prácticas de manejo en subastas de Medellín, Colombia. Se recopilaron datos de cuatro subastas ganaderas realizadas en junio de 2014. Se evaluaron 720 bovinos, los cuales, durante el pesaje y la conducción se subdividieron en 241 lotes y 28 grupos de lotes, respectivamente. Se caracterizaron los hallazgos en inspección veterinaria, así como las interacciones táctiles, auditivas y visuales de los manejadores y las respuestas conductuales en los bovinos. En la inspección veterinaria, en el 19.5% de los lotes se hicieron observaciones, con predominio de heridas abiertas (38.3%). En el área de pesaje se evidenciaron 824 interacciones, predominando las visuales (44.1%) sobre las táctiles (30.1%) y auditivas (25.8%); sin embargo, el 73.0, 66.4 y 88.4% de los animales no presentaron respuesta conductual a las interacciones visuales, táctiles y auditivas, respectivamente. En la conducción a corrales se registraron 214 interacciones, con predominio de las táctiles (42.5%) sobre las auditivas (30.8%) y visuales (26.6%); sin embargo, la mayoría de lotes solo presentó respuesta conductual a las interacciones táctiles (68%). Las interacciones positivas de manejo como el uso de silbidos, ondear el instrumento y alzar las manos generaron pocas respuestas conductuales y manejos más tranquilos de los animales. Por otro lado, golpear, punzar y gritar provocó mayor reactividad y comportamientos agonísticos en los animales.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2017-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1336010.15381/rivep.v28i3.13360Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2017); 571-585Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2017); 571-5851682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13360/12253Derechos de autor 2017 Lucia Herrán, Marlyn Romero, Lorena Herránhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/133602017-12-19T16:57:15Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
Interacción Humano-Animal y Prácticas de Manejo Bovino en Subastas Colombianas
title Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
spellingShingle Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
Herrán, Lucia
animal welfare
interactions
behavioral responses
handlers
bienestar animal
interacciones
respuestas conductuales
manejadores
title_short Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
title_full Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
title_fullStr Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
title_full_unstemmed Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
title_sort Human-animal interaction and cattle handling practices in Colombian livestock auctions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Herrán, Lucia
Romero, Marlyn
Herrán, Lorena
author Herrán, Lucia
author_facet Herrán, Lucia
Romero, Marlyn
Herrán, Lorena
author_role author
author2 Romero, Marlyn
Herrán, Lorena
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv animal welfare
interactions
behavioral responses
handlers
bienestar animal
interacciones
respuestas conductuales
manejadores
topic animal welfare
interactions
behavioral responses
handlers
bienestar animal
interacciones
respuestas conductuales
manejadores
description The objective of the study was to evaluate the human-animal interaction (HAI) and the handling practices at a livestock market in Medellin, Colombia. Data was collected at four livestock auctions in June 2014. A total of 720 bovines were distributed into 241 and 28 groups during the weighing and driving to the corral respectively. Findings during the veterinary inspection, as well as tactile, auditory and visual interactions of cattle handlers and behavioral responses of cattle were evaluated. In the veterinary inspection, 19.5% of the groups were observed, especially due to open wounds (38.3%). In the weighing area, there were 824 interactions, predominantly visual (44.1%) and then tactile (30.1%) and auditory (25.8%); however, 73.0, 66.4 and 88.4% of the animals had no behavioral response to visual, tactile and auditory interactions, respectively. Twenty-four interactions were recorded during driving to corrals, with tactile predominance (42.5%) over auditory (30.8%) and visual (26.6%); however, most of the groups presented only behavioral response to tactile interactions (68%). Positive handling interactions such as whistling, waving the instrument, and raising hands generated few behavioral responses and quieter animal handling. On the other hand, hitting, punching, and screaming provoked greater reactivity and agonistic behaviors in the animals.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13360
10.15381/rivep.v28i3.13360
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13360
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v28i3.13360
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13360/12253
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Lucia Herrán, Marlyn Romero, Lorena Herrán
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Lucia Herrán, Marlyn Romero, Lorena Herrán
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2017); 571-585
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2017); 571-585
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238228435927040
score 13.905282
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).