Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter

Descripción del Articulo

The objective of this research was to evaluate extraction methods for β-glucosidases comparing three buffer solutions (MUB, acetate, and maleate) at different incubation times (0.5 h to 10 h) and in three different soil orders (Mollisols, Andisols and Ultisols). Seven acidic soils were evaluated, sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gutiérrez, Viviana, Ortega-Blu, Rodrigo, Molina-Roco, Mauricio, M. Martínez, María
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/1645
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1645
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
id REVUNITRU_e689721639f48fb2180e660fa2c9a075
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/1645
network_acronym_str REVUNITRU
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
repository_id_str
spelling Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matterEfficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matterGutiérrez, VivianaOrtega-Blu, RodrigoMolina-Roco, MauricioM. Martínez, Maríasoil hydrolasesbuffer solutionssoil organic mattersoil qualityvolcanic soils.soil hydrolasesbuffer solutionssoil organic mattersoil qualityvolcanic soils.The objective of this research was to evaluate extraction methods for β-glucosidases comparing three buffer solutions (MUB, acetate, and maleate) at different incubation times (0.5 h to 10 h) and in three different soil orders (Mollisols, Andisols and Ultisols). Seven acidic soils were evaluated, showing differences in pH, OM, and clay contents. To evaluate the effect of OM as enzymes source, one soil of each order was treated to partially remove its OM and then the enzyme assay was performed. When using MUB and maleate buffers the highest (32 and 31 µg-pNP g-soil-1h-1 in average, respectively) were found, and the latter was significantly (p < 0.050) correlated with the soil clay content. The activity obtained with acetate buffer was much lower (38.2 µg-pNP g-soil-1h-1 in average). The use of MUB buffer with 1 h of incubation is suggested as extraction method, showing good reproducibility and allowing to express higher enzyme potential for soil comparisons. For the Andisol and Ultisol, the enzyme activity significantly decreased with the OM removal (%) indicating that OM is the major source of the measured β-glucosidase activity, while a different trend was observed for the Mollisol, in which the mineral fraction (mainly 2:1 type clay) appears to be involved in the increased enzyme activity displayed after the initial OM removal.The objective of this research was to evaluate extraction methods for β-glucosidases comparing three buffer solutions (MUB, acetate, and maleate) at different incubation times (0.5 h to 10 h) and in three different soil orders (Mollisols, Andisols and Ultisols). Seven acidic soils were evaluated, showing differences in pH, OM, and clay contents. To evaluate the effect of OM as enzymes source, one soil of each order was treated to partially remove its OM and then the enzyme assay was performed. When using MUB and maleate buffers the highest (32 and 31 µg-pNP g-soil-1h-1 in average, respectively) were found, and the latter was significantly (p < 0.050) correlated with the soil clay content. The activity obtained with acetate buffer was much lower (38.2 µg-pNP g-soil-1h-1 in average). The use of MUB buffer with 1 h of incubation is suggested as extraction method, showing good reproducibility and allowing to express higher enzyme potential for soil comparisons. For the Andisol and Ultisol, the enzyme activity significantly decreased with the OM removal (%) indicating that OM is the major source of the measured β-glucosidase activity, while a different trend was observed for the Mollisol, in which the mineral fraction (mainly 2:1 type clay) appears to be involved in the increased enzyme activity displayed after the initial OM removal.Universidad Nacional de Trujillo2017-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1645Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2017): Octubre - Diciembre; 419-429Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2017): Octubre - Diciembre; 419-4292306-67412077-9917reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstname:Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstacron:UNITRUspahttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1645/1645Derechos de autor 2017 Scientia Agropecuariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/16452018-04-03T07:17:16Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
title Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
spellingShingle Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
Gutiérrez, Viviana
soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
title_short Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
title_full Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
title_fullStr Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
title_sort Efficiency of three buffers for extracting β-glucosidase enzyme in different soil orders: Evaluating the role of soil organic matter
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gutiérrez, Viviana
Ortega-Blu, Rodrigo
Molina-Roco, Mauricio
M. Martínez, María
author Gutiérrez, Viviana
author_facet Gutiérrez, Viviana
Ortega-Blu, Rodrigo
Molina-Roco, Mauricio
M. Martínez, María
author_role author
author2 Ortega-Blu, Rodrigo
Molina-Roco, Mauricio
M. Martínez, María
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
topic soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
soil hydrolases
buffer solutions
soil organic matter
soil quality
volcanic soils.
description The objective of this research was to evaluate extraction methods for β-glucosidases comparing three buffer solutions (MUB, acetate, and maleate) at different incubation times (0.5 h to 10 h) and in three different soil orders (Mollisols, Andisols and Ultisols). Seven acidic soils were evaluated, showing differences in pH, OM, and clay contents. To evaluate the effect of OM as enzymes source, one soil of each order was treated to partially remove its OM and then the enzyme assay was performed. When using MUB and maleate buffers the highest (32 and 31 µg-pNP g-soil-1h-1 in average, respectively) were found, and the latter was significantly (p < 0.050) correlated with the soil clay content. The activity obtained with acetate buffer was much lower (38.2 µg-pNP g-soil-1h-1 in average). The use of MUB buffer with 1 h of incubation is suggested as extraction method, showing good reproducibility and allowing to express higher enzyme potential for soil comparisons. For the Andisol and Ultisol, the enzyme activity significantly decreased with the OM removal (%) indicating that OM is the major source of the measured β-glucosidase activity, while a different trend was observed for the Mollisol, in which the mineral fraction (mainly 2:1 type clay) appears to be involved in the increased enzyme activity displayed after the initial OM removal.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1645
url https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1645
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/1645/1645
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Scientia Agropecuaria
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2017 Scientia Agropecuaria
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2017): Octubre - Diciembre; 419-429
Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2017): Octubre - Diciembre; 419-429
2306-6741
2077-9917
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instname:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instacron:UNITRU
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
instacron_str UNITRU
institution UNITRU
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1843984355805888512
score 13.062494
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).