Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security
Descripción del Articulo
Adjustments in Brazilian livestock are necessary to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, since the largest source of methane comes from ruminants’ enteric fermentation, and of carbon from deforestation. Low-carbon agriculture technologies (LCAT) contribute to mitigating these emissions and this...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/6107 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | GHG Emission Semiarid ICLS Ruminants SWOT AHP Production Factors |
| id |
REVUNITRU_b6abe41f26ca4e9b4e04a5271b114514 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/6107 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNITRU |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food securityAntunes de Mattos, Vanina Zini Guerreiro Tavares, Bruna da Costa Barreto, Renata Parno Guimarães, Giselle Vasconcelos de Freitas, Marcos Aurélio GHG EmissionSemiaridICLSRuminantsSWOTAHPProduction FactorsAdjustments in Brazilian livestock are necessary to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, since the largest source of methane comes from ruminants’ enteric fermentation, and of carbon from deforestation. Low-carbon agriculture technologies (LCAT) contribute to mitigating these emissions and this study evaluates the role of these technologies on ruminant forage production in Caatinga. A Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threats analysis was used to elucidate the main features, followed by an Analytic Hierarchical Process, ranking the LCAT, and a risk analysis. Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System (ICLFS) is the most recommended technology, followed by Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) and Recovery of Degraded Areas with Pastures (RDA-P). The results can aid in the choice of the LCAT to be implemented by the smallholder in Caatinga, demonstrating the need to strengthen rural technical assistance, so that there is a real benefit to the producer and the environment.Universidad Nacional de Trujillo2024-11-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 15 Núm. 4 (2024): Octubre-Diciembre; 629-639Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2024): Octubre-Diciembre; 629-6392306-67412077-9917reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstname:Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstacron:UNITRUenghttps://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107/6206https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107/6588Derechos de autor 2024 Scientia Agropecuariahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/61072024-11-12T13:05:52Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| title |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| spellingShingle |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security Antunes de Mattos, Vanina Zini GHG Emission Semiarid ICLS Ruminants SWOT AHP Production Factors |
| title_short |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| title_full |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| title_fullStr |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| title_sort |
Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Antunes de Mattos, Vanina Zini Guerreiro Tavares, Bruna da Costa Barreto, Renata Parno Guimarães, Giselle Vasconcelos de Freitas, Marcos Aurélio |
| author |
Antunes de Mattos, Vanina Zini |
| author_facet |
Antunes de Mattos, Vanina Zini Guerreiro Tavares, Bruna da Costa Barreto, Renata Parno Guimarães, Giselle Vasconcelos de Freitas, Marcos Aurélio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Guerreiro Tavares, Bruna da Costa Barreto, Renata Parno Guimarães, Giselle Vasconcelos de Freitas, Marcos Aurélio |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
GHG Emission Semiarid ICLS Ruminants SWOT AHP Production Factors |
| topic |
GHG Emission Semiarid ICLS Ruminants SWOT AHP Production Factors |
| description |
Adjustments in Brazilian livestock are necessary to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, since the largest source of methane comes from ruminants’ enteric fermentation, and of carbon from deforestation. Low-carbon agriculture technologies (LCAT) contribute to mitigating these emissions and this study evaluates the role of these technologies on ruminant forage production in Caatinga. A Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threats analysis was used to elucidate the main features, followed by an Analytic Hierarchical Process, ranking the LCAT, and a risk analysis. Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System (ICLFS) is the most recommended technology, followed by Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) and Recovery of Degraded Areas with Pastures (RDA-P). The results can aid in the choice of the LCAT to be implemented by the smallholder in Caatinga, demonstrating the need to strengthen rural technical assistance, so that there is a real benefit to the producer and the environment. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-11-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107 |
| url |
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107/6206 https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6107/6588 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2024 Scientia Agropecuaria https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2024 Scientia Agropecuaria https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 15 Núm. 4 (2024): Octubre-Diciembre; 629-639 Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2024): Octubre-Diciembre; 629-639 2306-6741 2077-9917 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo instname:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo instacron:UNITRU |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| instacron_str |
UNITRU |
| institution |
UNITRU |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1847155292797665280 |
| score |
13.108393 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).