Sustainable livestock farming: Estimating forage biomass with RPAS and 3D modeling

Descripción del Articulo

An alternative to support sustainable and technological livestock farming is using aerial images through Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS). This method has demonstrated effective outcomes in assessing agricultural variables including height, volume, and biomass across vegetation and crops lik...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Tacuri Espinoza, Eduardo, López Espinoza, Mateo, Macancela Herrera, Alberto, Lupercio Novillo, Lucía
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2026
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/6774
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/6774
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:grass height
grass volume
pasture mixture
structure from motion
drone
Descripción
Sumario:An alternative to support sustainable and technological livestock farming is using aerial images through Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS). This method has demonstrated effective outcomes in assessing agricultural variables including height, volume, and biomass across vegetation and crops like pastures. The study was carried out at Nero farm in southern Ecuador. The objectives of this research were: i) demonstrate the validity of the aerial imagery method with traditional field methods for characterizing grassland agronomic parameters (height, volume, and biomass) and ii) evaluate which of the variables studied (height and volume) is the best predictor of grass fresh mass and dry mass. The first methodology consists of collecting in filed (paddock) height and volume of grass using a frame of 1 m2, then biomass was measured in laboratory. For the second method, aerial images were obtained through RPAS and processed to generate digital surface model (DSM) and digital terrain model (DTM). Finally, linear models were performed with respective R2 and error. The height and volume of grass of both methods represent up to 98% of data variability (p < 0.0001), also, the measures of central tendency and dispersion were so similar. Regarding the models of fresh and dry mass with height and volume digital of grass representing over 40% (p < 0.05), the digital height being the best predictor for dry (R2: 48%) and fresh mass (R2: 42%). This research revalidates the effectiveness use of aerial images in important crops from Ecuador.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).