Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes

Descripción del Articulo

This study aimed to compare two staining methods for detecting nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes in the Cytogenetics Laboratory of INMP (“Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal”), Lima, Peru.  A total of 60 metaphases with normal karyotypes were analyzed, of which 30 were s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rosas-Cartolin, Berioska, Gamboa-Oré, Ismenia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.revistas.unfv.edu.pe:article/1533
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:citogenética
heteromorfismos
NOR
satélites
cytogenetics
heteromorphisms
satellites
id REVUNFV_5763d9b0d546132f77477b83175d5eb5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unfv.edu.pe:article/1533
network_acronym_str REVUNFV
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
repository_id_str .
spelling Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomesComparación de dos métodos de tinción para la detección de regiones organizadoras nucleolares (NOR) de cromosomasRosas-Cartolin, Berioska Gamboa-Oré, Ismenia citogenética heteromorfismos NOR satélitescytogenetics heteromorphisms NOR satellitesThis study aimed to compare two staining methods for detecting nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes in the Cytogenetics Laboratory of INMP (“Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal”), Lima, Peru.  A total of 60 metaphases with normal karyotypes were analyzed, of which 30 were stained for each method: Kodama et al. and Howell & Black, respectively. The recognition efficiency and staining intensity of these regions were evaluated by each technique based on the count of NORs Ag (+); Likewise, the staining and integrity of the chromosomes were evaluated and the differences between these two methods were established. No significant differences were found regarding the number of stained regions with both techniques; however, in staining intensity and chromosomal quality, the Howell & Black method was superior. It is concluded that the Howell & Black method generates better results for the cytogenetic analysis of these regions.El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar dos métodos de tinción para la detección de regiones organizadoras nucleolares (NOR) de los cromosomas acrocéntricos en el Laboratorio de Citogenética del INMP (Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal), Lima, Perú. Se analizó un total de 60 metafases con cariotipos normales, de las cuales 30 fueron teñidas para cada método: Kodama et al. y Howell & Black, respectivamente.  Se evaluó la eficacia de reconocimiento e intensidad de tinción de estas regiones por cada método en función a la contabilización de NORs Ag (+); asimismo se evaluó la tinción e integridad de los cromosomas y se estableció las diferencias entre estos dos métodos. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto al número de regiones teñidas con ambos métodos; sin embargo, en la intensidad de tinción y calidad cromosómica el método de Howell & Black fue superior. Se concluye que el método de Howell & Black genera mejores resultados para el análisis citogenético de estas regiones.Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática. Escuela Profesional de Biología2023-01-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/ziphttps://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533The Biologist; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2023): The Biologist (Lima); 59-65The Biologist; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2023): The Biologist (Lima); 59-651994-90731816-0719reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarrealinstname:Universidad Nacional Federico Villarrealinstacron:UNFVspahttps://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533/2248https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533/2338https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533/2267https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.revistas.unfv.edu.pe:article/15332023-03-22T14:05:25Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
Comparación de dos métodos de tinción para la detección de regiones organizadoras nucleolares (NOR) de cromosomas
title Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
spellingShingle Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
Rosas-Cartolin, Berioska
citogenética
heteromorfismos
NOR
satélites
cytogenetics
heteromorphisms
NOR
satellites
title_short Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
title_full Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
title_fullStr Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
title_sort Comparison of two staining methods for the detection of nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rosas-Cartolin, Berioska
Gamboa-Oré, Ismenia
author Rosas-Cartolin, Berioska
author_facet Rosas-Cartolin, Berioska
Gamboa-Oré, Ismenia
author_role author
author2 Gamboa-Oré, Ismenia
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv citogenética
heteromorfismos
NOR
satélites
cytogenetics
heteromorphisms
NOR
satellites
topic citogenética
heteromorfismos
NOR
satélites
cytogenetics
heteromorphisms
NOR
satellites
description This study aimed to compare two staining methods for detecting nucleolar organizing regions (NOR) of acrocentric chromosomes in the Cytogenetics Laboratory of INMP (“Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal”), Lima, Peru.  A total of 60 metaphases with normal karyotypes were analyzed, of which 30 were stained for each method: Kodama et al. and Howell & Black, respectively. The recognition efficiency and staining intensity of these regions were evaluated by each technique based on the count of NORs Ag (+); Likewise, the staining and integrity of the chromosomes were evaluated and the differences between these two methods were established. No significant differences were found regarding the number of stained regions with both techniques; however, in staining intensity and chromosomal quality, the Howell & Black method was superior. It is concluded that the Howell & Black method generates better results for the cytogenetic analysis of these regions.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533
url https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533/2248
https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533/2338
https://revistas.unfv.edu.pe/rtb/article/view/1533/2267
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática. Escuela Profesional de Biología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática. Escuela Profesional de Biología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Biologist; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2023): The Biologist (Lima); 59-65
The Biologist; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2023): The Biologist (Lima); 59-65
1994-9073
1816-0719
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
instname:Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
instacron:UNFV
instname_str Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
instacron_str UNFV
institution UNFV
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789172152509923328
score 13.909645
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).