Análise das provas de matemática da Olimpíada Nacional de Matemática (OLNAMAT - 2017)
Descripción del Articulo
The research carried out is non-experimental and descriptive level; It consisted of analyzing the results of the mathematics tests that were applied to the students of Regular Basic Education (RBE) in the "10th National Mathematical Olympiad (OLNAMAT - 2017)" conducted by students and prof...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional del Centro de Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional del Centro de Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.uncp.edu.pe:article/1085 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.uncp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontedelaciencia/article/view/1085 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | confiabilidad índice de dificultad coeficiente de validez poder discriminativo prueba pedagógica confiabilidade índice de dificuldade coeficiente de validade teste pedagógico reliability difficulty index validity coefficient discriminative power pedagogical test |
| Sumario: | The research carried out is non-experimental and descriptive level; It consisted of analyzing the results of the mathematics tests that were applied to the students of Regular Basic Education (RBE) in the "10th National Mathematical Olympiad (OLNAMAT - 2017)" conducted by students and professors of the PAS Mathematical Sciences and Information Technology of the Faculty of Education of the National University of Central Peru. A sample of 100 mathematics tests for initial education of 04 and 05 years was taken, determining their reliability, difficulty index, discriminative power and validity coefficient. Statistical methodology was applied for quantitative data processing and some of the psychometric and edumetric statistics were calculated. Concluding that the mathematics tests for initial education of 04 and 05 years have α = 0,623 and KR = 0,961, and α = 0,720 and KR = 0,985, respectively; that is, they are reliable for data collection; furthermore, the tests have 5 items (33%) and 7 items (47%), characterized as "difficult"; respectively, as well as 10 items (67%) with “very good discrimination”. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).