Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’

Descripción del Articulo

de Siguas, Arequipa Province, Peru. The concentrations used were 2, 4, and 6 kg ha−1 with 4 applications by means of impregnation to the transplant and via drench every 15 days. The statistical design was through a DBCA with factorial arrangement randomly distributed in four blocks. The tests used w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mamani, E., Acosta, M., Gonzales, M.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.lamolina.edu.pe:article/1339
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/1339
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Biological formulation
Azotobacter salinestris
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
and Rhizophagus intraradices.
id REVUNALM_e08a32ee2e67f49761b70e44bfbb7a57
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.lamolina.edu.pe:article/1339
network_acronym_str REVUNALM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’Mamani, E.Acosta, M.Gonzales, M.Biological formulationAzotobacter salinestrisBacillus amyloliquefaciensand Rhizophagus intraradices.de Siguas, Arequipa Province, Peru. The concentrations used were 2, 4, and 6 kg ha−1 with 4 applications by means of impregnation to the transplant and via drench every 15 days. The statistical design was through a DBCA with factorial arrangement randomly distributed in four blocks. The tests used were the orthogonal contrast test and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (α = 0.05). The findings showed that the treatment concentrations of 4 kg ha−1 and 6 kg ha−1 resulted in a lower incidence of Fusarium oxysporum, at 6.71% and 9.36%, an ABCPE of 637.78 and 950.14 units, and an exportable yield of 66.34 t ha−1 and 65.42 t ha−1, respectively, displaying significant differences from the control. The first application was statistically significant to the treatments with the highest number of applications, showing a greater exportable yield of 67.54 t ha−1. The best interactions between concentrations and applications were 6 kg ha−1 with 1 application, 4 kg ha−1 with 2 applications, and 4 kg ha−1 with 1 application, with exportable yields of 70.66, 69.61, and 69.11 t ha−1, respectively.Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina2019-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/133910.21704/pja.v3i3.1339Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): September to December; 81-90Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2019): September to December; 81-902616-4477reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molinainstname:Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molinainstacron:UNALMenghttps://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/1339/pdf_27Derechos de autor 2019 E. Mamani, M. Acosta, M. Gonzalesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.lamolina.edu.pe:article/13392025-05-12T18:17:46Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
title Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
spellingShingle Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
Mamani, E.
Biological formulation
Azotobacter salinestris
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
and Rhizophagus intraradices.
title_short Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
title_full Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
title_fullStr Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
title_sort Effect of the applications of a biological formulation (Azotobacter salinestris, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizophagus intraradices) on the yield of Allium cepa ‘Century’
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mamani, E.
Acosta, M.
Gonzales, M.
author Mamani, E.
author_facet Mamani, E.
Acosta, M.
Gonzales, M.
author_role author
author2 Acosta, M.
Gonzales, M.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biological formulation
Azotobacter salinestris
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
and Rhizophagus intraradices.
topic Biological formulation
Azotobacter salinestris
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
and Rhizophagus intraradices.
description de Siguas, Arequipa Province, Peru. The concentrations used were 2, 4, and 6 kg ha−1 with 4 applications by means of impregnation to the transplant and via drench every 15 days. The statistical design was through a DBCA with factorial arrangement randomly distributed in four blocks. The tests used were the orthogonal contrast test and Duncan’s multiple comparison test (α = 0.05). The findings showed that the treatment concentrations of 4 kg ha−1 and 6 kg ha−1 resulted in a lower incidence of Fusarium oxysporum, at 6.71% and 9.36%, an ABCPE of 637.78 and 950.14 units, and an exportable yield of 66.34 t ha−1 and 65.42 t ha−1, respectively, displaying significant differences from the control. The first application was statistically significant to the treatments with the highest number of applications, showing a greater exportable yield of 67.54 t ha−1. The best interactions between concentrations and applications were 6 kg ha−1 with 1 application, 4 kg ha−1 with 2 applications, and 4 kg ha−1 with 1 application, with exportable yields of 70.66, 69.61, and 69.11 t ha−1, respectively.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/1339
10.21704/pja.v3i3.1339
url https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/1339
identifier_str_mv 10.21704/pja.v3i3.1339
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.lamolina.edu.pe/index.php/jpagronomy/article/view/1339/pdf_27
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 E. Mamani, M. Acosta, M. Gonzales
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 E. Mamani, M. Acosta, M. Gonzales
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): September to December; 81-90
Peruvian Journal of Agronomy; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2019): September to December; 81-90
2616-4477
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
instname:Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
instacron:UNALM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
instacron_str UNALM
institution UNALM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1847063427412918272
score 12.836096
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).