First year medical students’ learning styles and performance (2016-2017) at Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

Descripción del Articulo

Introduction: The learning styles were studied decades ago because of their usefulness for the creation of strategies following the students’ profile, in different education levels and courses. The performance achieved is considered in order to evaluate the efficiency of the strategies. So far, ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Hoyos-Flores, Mirko Humberto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad María Auxiliadora
Repositorio:Agora
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/74
Enlace del recurso:https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/74
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Estilos de aprendizaje
Rendimiento académico
cuestionario Honey-Alonso
Learning styles
academic performance
Honey-Alonso cuestionary
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The learning styles were studied decades ago because of their usefulness for the creation of strategies following the students’ profile, in different education levels and courses. The performance achieved is considered in order to evaluate the efficiency of the strategies. So far, there is not a study that relates the learning style with the academic performance. Objective: This study has its goal in the identification of the learning styles used by the first year medical students, according to their preference level, and the relation between the style and the academic performance. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 234 students that were taking the first year on 2016 and 2017. We applied the Honey-Alonso questionary in order to classify the participants by their learning styles as active, reflective, theoretical, and pragmatic. We calculated also the preference of each style and searched for the relation between them and the academic performance. Results: The participants were 19 years old in average. The predominant style was the reflective (70.19%), following the theoretical (13.94%), pragmatic (10.58%) and the active (5.29%). We evidenced the domain of two styles among 22 students and three styles in 3 students and we didn´t find any statistical relation between the styles and the performance. Conclusion: The reflective prevailed and had a moderate preference, the other styles had a very high preference. There is not relation between the learning styles and the academic performance.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).