The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America

Descripción del Articulo

The consensus method is an infrequently utilized group of research techniques for health services research in Latin America. The consensus method derives provides researchers with the ability to achieve a quantitative estimate through a qualitative approach. The consensus method represents an episte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Palmieri, Patrick A.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad María Auxiliadora
Repositorio:Agora
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/68
Enlace del recurso:https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/68
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Consenso
Delphi
Cualitativo
resolución de problemas
panel de expertos
análisis crítico
consensus
qualitative
problem-solving
expert panel
critical analysis
id REVUMA_ae305b5e8d0a6dcd72beefb1fcd365b6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/68
network_acronym_str REVUMA
network_name_str Agora
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
La técnica Delphi: Un método de consenso para la investigación en servicios de salud en Latino América
title The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
spellingShingle The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
Palmieri, Patrick A.
Consenso
Delphi
Cualitativo
resolución de problemas
panel de expertos
análisis crítico
consensus
Delphi
qualitative
problem-solving
expert panel
critical analysis
title_short The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
title_full The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
title_fullStr The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
title_full_unstemmed The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
title_sort The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin America
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Palmieri, Patrick A.
author Palmieri, Patrick A.
author_facet Palmieri, Patrick A.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Consenso
Delphi
Cualitativo
resolución de problemas
panel de expertos
análisis crítico
consensus
Delphi
qualitative
problem-solving
expert panel
critical analysis
topic Consenso
Delphi
Cualitativo
resolución de problemas
panel de expertos
análisis crítico
consensus
Delphi
qualitative
problem-solving
expert panel
critical analysis
description The consensus method is an infrequently utilized group of research techniques for health services research in Latin America. The consensus method derives provides researchers with the ability to achieve a quantitative estimate through a qualitative approach. The consensus method represents an epistemological approach to the inexact sciences. The consensus method, including the nominal group and Delphi techniques, are useful when expert agreement on the formulation of recommendations is required, especially when scientific evidence is unavailable, existing evidence is disputed, or there is a little risk-benefit balance. The overall goal is to arrive at a valid conclusion, or consensus, from a repetitive group deliberation in response to a well-defined research question. The Delphi technique is an essential method to achieve consensus in areas where none previously existed, or the evidence is limited, low quality, and/or subject to debate. There are four general areas when researchers should consider the Delphi technique, including 1) The research problem does not lend itself to precise analytical techniques but can benefit from subjective judgments on a collective basis; 2) The research population presents diverse backgrounds with respect to experience and expertise; 3) More subjects are required than can effectively interact face-to-face; and 4) Time, costs, and logistics would make frequent meetings of all subjects unfeasible. The Delphi technique creates a structured environment for experts to review the best available information specific to a research question to formulate solutions to answer the question through a robust process. Overall, the Delphi technique is a powerful qualitative research method that needs to be utilized in Latin American health services research.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/68
10.21679/arc.v4i2.89
url https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/68
identifier_str_mv 10.21679/arc.v4i2.89
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/68/68
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Patrick A. Palmieri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Patrick A. Palmieri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad María Auxiliadora - UMA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad María Auxiliadora - UMA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica Ágora ; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2017); 30-38
2412-804X
10.21679/arc.v4i2
reponame:Agora
instname:Universidad María Auxiliadora
instacron:UMA
instname_str Universidad María Auxiliadora
instacron_str UMA
institution UMA
reponame_str Agora
collection Agora
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1778116673544388608
spelling The Delphi technique: A consensus method for research in health services in Latin AmericaLa técnica Delphi: Un método de consenso para la investigación en servicios de salud en Latino AméricaPalmieri, Patrick A.ConsensoDelphiCualitativoresolución de problemaspanel de expertosanálisis críticoconsensusDelphiqualitativeproblem-solvingexpert panelcritical analysisThe consensus method is an infrequently utilized group of research techniques for health services research in Latin America. The consensus method derives provides researchers with the ability to achieve a quantitative estimate through a qualitative approach. The consensus method represents an epistemological approach to the inexact sciences. The consensus method, including the nominal group and Delphi techniques, are useful when expert agreement on the formulation of recommendations is required, especially when scientific evidence is unavailable, existing evidence is disputed, or there is a little risk-benefit balance. The overall goal is to arrive at a valid conclusion, or consensus, from a repetitive group deliberation in response to a well-defined research question. The Delphi technique is an essential method to achieve consensus in areas where none previously existed, or the evidence is limited, low quality, and/or subject to debate. There are four general areas when researchers should consider the Delphi technique, including 1) The research problem does not lend itself to precise analytical techniques but can benefit from subjective judgments on a collective basis; 2) The research population presents diverse backgrounds with respect to experience and expertise; 3) More subjects are required than can effectively interact face-to-face; and 4) Time, costs, and logistics would make frequent meetings of all subjects unfeasible. The Delphi technique creates a structured environment for experts to review the best available information specific to a research question to formulate solutions to answer the question through a robust process. Overall, the Delphi technique is a powerful qualitative research method that needs to be utilized in Latin American health services research.El método de consenso es un grupo de técnicas de investigación utilizado con poca frecuencia para la investigación de servicios de salud en América Latina. El método de consenso proporciona a los investigadores la capacidad de lograr una estimación cuantitativa a través de un enfoque cualitativo. El método de consenso representa un enfoque epistemológico de las ciencias inexactas. Este método que incluye el grupo nominal y la técnica Delphi es útil cuando se requiere un acuerdo de expertos sobre la formulación de recomendaciones, especialmente cuando la evidencia científica no está disponible, las evidencia existentes se debate, o si existe un pequeño equilibrio entre el riesgo-beneficio. El objetivo general es llegar a una conclusión válida, o consenso, de una deliberación grupal repetitiva en respuesta a una pregunta de investigación bien definida. La técnica Delphi es un método esencial para lograr consenso en áreas donde no existía anteriormente evidencia, es limitada, de baja calidad y / o sujeta a debate. Existen cuatro áreas generales en las que los investigadores deberían considerar la técnica Delphi, que incluyen 1) El problema de la investigación no se presta a técnicas analíticas precisas, pero puede beneficiarse de juicios subjetivos sobre una base colectiva; 2) La población de investigación presenta diversos antecedentes con respecto a la experiencia y pericia; 3) Se requieren más sujetos que puedan interactuar eficazmente frente a frente; y 4) El tiempo, los costos y la logística harían inviable las reuniones frecuentes de todos los involucrados. La técnica Delphi crea un entorno estructurado para que los expertos evalúen la mejor información disponible relacionada a una pregunta de investigación y formulen soluciones para responder a esta pregunta a través de un proceso concreto. En general, la técnica Delphi es un poderoso método de investigación cualitativo que debe utilizarse en la investigación de servicios de salud en América Latina.Universidad María Auxiliadora - UMA2017-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/6810.21679/arc.v4i2.89Revista Científica Ágora ; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2017); 30-382412-804X10.21679/arc.v4i2reponame:Agorainstname:Universidad María Auxiliadorainstacron:UMAspahttps://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/68/68Derechos de autor 2021 Patrick A. Palmierihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/682021-04-02T01:53:10Z
score 13.754616
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).