Nivel de resiliencia y funcionalidad familiar en adolescentes de un albergue de Ventanilla, Perú

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: To determine the relationship between the level of resilience and family functionality in adolescents of the Ventanilla shelter, Peru. Material and Methods: The study approach is quantitative, the design is non-experimental, correlational and cross-sectional. The population consisted of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Choque Medrano, Edith, Matta Solis, Hernán Hugo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad María Auxiliadora
Repositorio:Agora
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaagora.com:article/76
Enlace del recurso:https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/76
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Resiliencia
adolescentes
asunción de riesgos
relaciones familiares
Resilience
adolescent
risk-taking
family relations
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: To determine the relationship between the level of resilience and family functionality in adolescents of the Ventanilla shelter, Peru. Material and Methods: The study approach is quantitative, the design is non-experimental, correlational and cross-sectional. The population consisted of 160 adolescents residing in the shelter. The instruments used were the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) and the family APGAR questionnaire. Results: In relation to the level of resilience, the average level predominated (52.5%), followed by the high level (46.9%) and low level (0.6%). The dimension of resilience that presented the highest percentage of high level of resilience was control and purpose (61.9%), the one that presented the highest percentage of low level of resilience was spirituality (8.1%). Regarding family functionality, families with mild dysfunction predominated (33.1%), followed by moderate dysfunction (28.8%), good function (25.6%) and severe dysfunction (12.5%). The statistical test of bivariate Spearman correlation shows a correlation coefficient of 0.349 (p <0.01), that is, the main variables of the study resilience and family functionality, have a moderate proportional relationship with a margin of error of 0.01 (1%). Conclusions: The predominant level of resilience was the means. In terms of family functionality, families with mild dysfunction predominated. The variable resilience and family functionality present a directly proportional moderate relationship.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).