Fake News: Where Journalists and Audiences Meet (and Where They Don’t)

Descripción del Articulo

This article gives voice to two protagonists of the disinformation phenomenon: audiences and journalists. A two-objective comparative analysis is presented: on the one hand, to explore the audiences’ role in stimulating the disinformation phenomenon in Costa Rica and characterize the reception dynam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Carazo-Barrantes, Carolina, Tristán-Jiménez, Larissa, Cajina-Rojas, Mariana
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/5623
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/5623
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Audiences
fake news
journalism
social media
fact-checkers
audiencias
noticias falsas
periodismo
redes sociales
audiências
notícias falsas
jornalismo
mídia social
checagem de fatos
Descripción
Sumario:This article gives voice to two protagonists of the disinformation phenomenon: audiences and journalists. A two-objective comparative analysis is presented: on the one hand, to explore the audiences’ role in stimulating the disinformation phenomenon in Costa Rica and characterize the reception dynamics and interaction that they establish with fake news within the country; on the other hand, to give journalists a voice to compare and contrast their perceptions with their audiences’ perceptions. A qualitative methodology based on semi-structured interviews with a small and non-representative sample of Costa Rican journalists holding leadership positions at some of the country’s most important media outlets was used. Also, six discussion groups with audiences were held. This article performs a comparative analysis of what journalists and participating audiences think about the disinformation phenomenon, the term “fake news,” the responsibilities in the fight against this problem and the possible solutions. The results suggest that, according to journalists, misinformative content circulates on social media and does not come from the traditional media they represent. In contrast, audiences present an antagonistic position since they tend to associate disinformation with the traditional media. However, they also consider traditional media as a source of verification of false content circulating on social media.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).