Otherproof

Descripción del Articulo

Delimiting a field of study and fixing a corpus of texts that will serve as the basis for the analysis are not the only tasks facing semiotics. There is another dimension, that of intersubjectivity, which raises interesting problems between the semiotic analyst and his sources of information. That o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Landowski, Eric
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/659
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/659
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVULIMA_9d8cd297579ef6579acfb6828982067f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/659
network_acronym_str REVULIMA
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository_id_str
spelling OtherproofA prueba del otroLandowski, EricDelimiting a field of study and fixing a corpus of texts that will serve as the basis for the analysis are not the only tasks facing semiotics. There is another dimension, that of intersubjectivity, which raises interesting problems between the semiotic analyst and his sources of information. That otherness has an ethical framework, whose rigorous compliance depends on the study of a certain matter without falling into stereotypes or deformations. It is therefore a question of overcoming the univocal and exclusive view of the researcher, to give way to the voice of the other, to that symbolic space of dialogue and cultural exchange that enriches perspectives and establishes currents of empathy between the student and his object of study.Delimitar un campo de estudio y fijar un corpus de textos que servirán de base al análisis no son las únicas tareas que enfrenta la semiótica. Hay otra dimensión, la de la intersubjetividad, que plantea interesantes problemas entre el analista semiótico y sus fuentes de información. Esa otredad tiene un marco ético, de cuyo riguroso cumplimiento depende el estudio de un determinado asunto sin caer en estereotipos ni deformaciones. Se trata, pues, de superar la mirada unívoca y excluyente del investigador para dar paso a la voz del otro, a ese espacio simbólico de diálogo e intercambio cultural que enriquece perspectivas y establece corrientes de empatía entre el estudioso y su objeto de estudio.  Universidad de Lima. Facultad de Comunicación2016-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEvaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/65910.26439/contratexto2016.n026.659Contratexto; No. 026 (2016); 13-29Contratexto; Núm. 026 (2016); 13-29Contratexto; n. 026 (2016); 13-291993-49041025-994510.26439/contratexto2016.n026reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Limainstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAspahttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/659/1345Copyright (c) 2017 Contratextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6592023-07-21T20:11:11Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Otherproof
A prueba del otro
title Otherproof
spellingShingle Otherproof
Landowski, Eric
title_short Otherproof
title_full Otherproof
title_fullStr Otherproof
title_full_unstemmed Otherproof
title_sort Otherproof
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Landowski, Eric
author Landowski, Eric
author_facet Landowski, Eric
author_role author
description Delimiting a field of study and fixing a corpus of texts that will serve as the basis for the analysis are not the only tasks facing semiotics. There is another dimension, that of intersubjectivity, which raises interesting problems between the semiotic analyst and his sources of information. That otherness has an ethical framework, whose rigorous compliance depends on the study of a certain matter without falling into stereotypes or deformations. It is therefore a question of overcoming the univocal and exclusive view of the researcher, to give way to the voice of the other, to that symbolic space of dialogue and cultural exchange that enriches perspectives and establishes currents of empathy between the student and his object of study.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/659
10.26439/contratexto2016.n026.659
url https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/659
identifier_str_mv 10.26439/contratexto2016.n026.659
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/659/1345
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Contratexto
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Contratexto
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima. Facultad de Comunicación
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima. Facultad de Comunicación
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contratexto; No. 026 (2016); 13-29
Contratexto; Núm. 026 (2016); 13-29
Contratexto; n. 026 (2016); 13-29
1993-4904
1025-9945
10.26439/contratexto2016.n026
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
instname:Universidad de Lima
instacron:ULIMA
instname_str Universidad de Lima
instacron_str ULIMA
institution ULIMA
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
collection Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846791803137687552
score 13.926842
Otherproof
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares