A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing

Descripción del Articulo

This article shows the results of the comparison of using a non-conti­nuous system technology and a continuous system technology in terms of the quality obtained in both processes. The non-continuous system technology produces second class quinoa with a yield of 86 %, and the continuous system techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Arapa Carcasi, Percy
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/4544
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/4544
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVULIMA_8e05bb8f49cef8cc626da297a044afa6
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/4544
network_acronym_str REVULIMA
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processingEstudio comparativo del uso de dos tecnologías como factor de calidad en el procesamiento de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd)Arapa Carcasi, PercyThis article shows the results of the comparison of using a non-conti­nuous system technology and a continuous system technology in terms of the quality obtained in both processes. The non-continuous system technology produces second class quinoa with a yield of 86 %, and the continuous system technology produces first class quinoa with a yield of 96 %, which represents a significant difference between both systems.En este artículo se muestran los resultados de la comparación del uso de tecnología de sistema no continuo y tecnología de sistema continuo en cuanto a la calidad obtenida en ambos procesos, obteniendo la tecnología de sistema no continuo, quinua de categoría 2 con un rendimiento del 86 % y la tecnología de sistema continuo, quinua de categoría 1 con un rendimiento del 96 %; una diferencia significativa entre ambos sistemas.Universidad de Lima2019-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/454410.26439/ing.ind2019.n037.4544Ingeniería Industrial; No. 037 (2019); 101-111Ingeniería Industrial; Núm. 037 (2019); 101-1112523-63261025-992910.26439/ing.ind2019.n037reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Limainstname:Universidad de Limainstacron:ULIMAspahttps://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/4544/4489https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/45442023-07-21T20:50:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
Estudio comparativo del uso de dos tecnologías como factor de calidad en el procesamiento de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd)
title A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
spellingShingle A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
Arapa Carcasi, Percy
title_short A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
title_full A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
title_fullStr A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
title_sort A comparative study of the use of two technologies as a quality factor in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd) processing
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arapa Carcasi, Percy
author Arapa Carcasi, Percy
author_facet Arapa Carcasi, Percy
author_role author
description This article shows the results of the comparison of using a non-conti­nuous system technology and a continuous system technology in terms of the quality obtained in both processes. The non-continuous system technology produces second class quinoa with a yield of 86 %, and the continuous system technology produces first class quinoa with a yield of 96 %, which represents a significant difference between both systems.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/4544
10.26439/ing.ind2019.n037.4544
url https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/4544
identifier_str_mv 10.26439/ing.ind2019.n037.4544
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/Ingenieria_industrial/article/view/4544/4489
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Lima
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ingeniería Industrial; No. 037 (2019); 101-111
Ingeniería Industrial; Núm. 037 (2019); 101-111
2523-6326
1025-9929
10.26439/ing.ind2019.n037
reponame:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
instname:Universidad de Lima
instacron:ULIMA
instname_str Universidad de Lima
instacron_str ULIMA
institution ULIMA
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad de Lima
collection Revistas - Universidad de Lima
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844893187790864384
score 13.300837
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).