What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)

Descripción del Articulo

This article analyses the complete history of the Facebook forum on Big Brother Spain during 2011-2019. For this study, more than 1.2 million Facebook comments were retrieved, and later thematic patterns from these units of content were identified and analysed. It examines what the most recurrent is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cabeza, José, Casado, Raúl, Paz, María Antonia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad de Piura
Repositorio:Revista de Comunicación
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/2919
Enlace del recurso:https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2919
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:redes sociales
feminismo
reality show
Facebook
Gran Hermano
social media
feminism
Big Brother
id REVUDEP_9eff2593f2b6fb0419bd17c34bb14235
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/2919
network_acronym_str REVUDEP
network_name_str Revista de Comunicación
repository_id_str
spelling What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)¿Qué se comenta de un reality? Análisis del foro en Facebook de Gran Hermano España (2011-2019) Cabeza, José Casado, Raúl Paz, María Antonia redes socialesfeminismoreality showFacebookGran Hermanosocial mediafeminismreality showFacebookBig BrotherThis article analyses the complete history of the Facebook forum on Big Brother Spain during 2011-2019. For this study, more than 1.2 million Facebook comments were retrieved, and later thematic patterns from these units of content were identified and analysed. It examines what the most recurrent issues the fans talk about, and their standpoint on those. Forum participants accept and fully participate in the logic of the program (both its mechanics and its end goal), but sometimes mistrust and question the broadcaster’s impartiality when they consider that the network is meddling in the reality for commercial purposes. Yet any censorship made by the program on events which may hurt its image goes unnoticed. Viewers, largely women, criticize female contestants three times (2.79) more than men. However, there is also a degree of gender alliance between forum members and female contestants, as these receive more support to win the contest.Este artículo analiza el historial completo del foro de Facebook de Gran Hermano España durante el período 2011-2019. En el estudio se obtuvieron más de 1,2 millones de comentarios del grupo de Facebook. Se investiga cuáles son los temas más recurrentes de los que hablan los fans del programa y cuál es su posición ante ellos. Los participantes aceptan la lógica del reality (mecánica y objetivo final), pero a veces cuestionan la imparcialidad de la cadena si aprecian que interviene en la realidad para obtener una ventaja comercial. Sin embargo, pasa inadvertida la censura que ejerce el programa sobre los comentarios de sucesos que puedan dañar su imagen. Los espectadores, mayoritariamente de género femenino, critican tres veces más (2,79) a las mujeres concursantes que a los hombres. Sin embargo, también hay cierta alianza de género entre foristas y concursantes femeninas: se las apoya más a ellas para que ganen. Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación2022-09-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticle evaluated by pairstextArtículo evaluado por parestextoapplication/pdfhttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/291910.26441/RC21.2-2022-A3Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022); 51-68Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022); 51-682227-14651684-0933reponame:Revista de Comunicacióninstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2919/2488Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Comunicaciónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/29192022-09-13T21:18:00Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
¿Qué se comenta de un reality? Análisis del foro en Facebook de Gran Hermano España (2011-2019)
title What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
spellingShingle What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
Cabeza, José
redes sociales
feminismo
reality show
Facebook
Gran Hermano
social media
feminism
reality show
Facebook
Big Brother
title_short What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
title_full What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
title_fullStr What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
title_full_unstemmed What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
title_sort What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cabeza, José
Casado, Raúl
Paz, María Antonia
author Cabeza, José
author_facet Cabeza, José
Casado, Raúl
Paz, María Antonia
author_role author
author2 Casado, Raúl
Paz, María Antonia
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv redes sociales
feminismo
reality show
Facebook
Gran Hermano
social media
feminism
reality show
Facebook
Big Brother
topic redes sociales
feminismo
reality show
Facebook
Gran Hermano
social media
feminism
reality show
Facebook
Big Brother
description This article analyses the complete history of the Facebook forum on Big Brother Spain during 2011-2019. For this study, more than 1.2 million Facebook comments were retrieved, and later thematic patterns from these units of content were identified and analysed. It examines what the most recurrent issues the fans talk about, and their standpoint on those. Forum participants accept and fully participate in the logic of the program (both its mechanics and its end goal), but sometimes mistrust and question the broadcaster’s impartiality when they consider that the network is meddling in the reality for commercial purposes. Yet any censorship made by the program on events which may hurt its image goes unnoticed. Viewers, largely women, criticize female contestants three times (2.79) more than men. However, there is also a degree of gender alliance between forum members and female contestants, as these receive more support to win the contest.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Article evaluated by pairs
text
Artículo evaluado por pares
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2919
10.26441/RC21.2-2022-A3
url https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2919
identifier_str_mv 10.26441/RC21.2-2022-A3
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2919/2488
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Comunicación
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Comunicación
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022); 51-68
Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022); 51-68
2227-1465
1684-0933
reponame:Revista de Comunicación
instname:Universidad de Piura
instacron:UDEP
instname_str Universidad de Piura
instacron_str UDEP
institution UDEP
reponame_str Revista de Comunicación
collection Revista de Comunicación
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1744419452330442752
score 13.955691
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).