Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura
Descripción del Articulo
The general objective of this research was to analyse the evidence of validity, reliability and equity of the Self Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self- Report. 189 college students participated between the ages of 18 and 42. The results obtained were found that items 4, 8 and 9 did not have adequate...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Universidad César Vallejo |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad César Vallejo |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.revistas.ucv.edu.pe:article/235 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/235 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Autorregulación del aprendizaje Validez Confiabilidad Equidad Estudiantes universitarios Self-regulation of learning Validity Reliability Equity University students |
id |
REVUCV_3b005d83f2892a2474a596b07c366f60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.revistas.ucv.edu.pe:article/235 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUCV |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad César Vallejo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of PiuraSelf-Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self-Report (SRSI-SR): evidencias de validez, confiabilidad y equidad en estudiantes universitarios de la ciudad de PiuraMoscol Seminario, JimenaOlivas Ugarte, Lincol OrlandoAutorregulación del aprendizajeValidezConfiabilidadEquidadEstudiantes universitariosSelf-regulation of learningValidityReliabilityEquityUniversity studentsThe general objective of this research was to analyse the evidence of validity, reliability and equity of the Self Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self- Report. 189 college students participated between the ages of 18 and 42. The results obtained were found that items 4, 8 and 9 did not have adequate rates of corrected homogeneity or communality. Evidence of convergent validity in relation to selfconcept and academic self-efficacy and discriminatory validity in relation to exam anxiety. In addition, exploratory factorial analysis reported four factors with an explained variance of 69.55%, while the final confirmatory analysis, demonstrated fit of the four-factor correlated model (X2= 93,654, df= 71, X2/df= 1.31, CFI= .974, TLI= .967, RMSEA= .071, SRMR= .044). In addition, reliability was determined through the Alpha Ordinal coefficient by reporting an index in its dimensions of .85 in OT, .79 in HIR, .86 in OE, .86 in BI, and the total reliability of .96. Finally, evidence of equity by sex and age was found, affirming that the score comparison of this instrument based on these variables will be valid and reliable in subsequent studies.La presente investigación tuvo como objetivo general analizar las evidencias de validez, confiabilidad y equidad del Self-Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self- Report. Participaron 189 estudiantes universitarios entre 18 y 42 años. Dentro de los resultados obtenidos se encontró que los ítems 4, 8 y 9 no presentaban índices adecuados de homogeneidad corregida ni de comunalidad. Se constató las evidencias de validez convergente en relación con el autoconcepto y la autoeficacia académica y validez discriminante en relación a la ansiedad ante exámenes. Además, el AFE reportó cuatro factores con una varianza explicada de 69.55%, mientras que el análisis confirmatorio final, demostró ajuste del modelo de cuatro factores correlacionados (X2= 93.654, df= 71, X2/df= 1.31, CFI= .974, TLI= .967, RMSEA= .071, SRMR= .044). Además, se determinó la fiabilidad a través del coeficiente Alfa Ordinal reportando un índice en sus dimensiones de .85 en OT, .79 en HIR, .86 en OE, .86 en BI, y la fiabilidad total de .96. Finalmente, se encontró evidencias de equidad por sexo y edad, afirmando que la comparación de puntuación del este instrumento en base a estas variables, serán válidas y confiables en posteriores estudios.Universidad Cesar Vallejo2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/23510.18050/psiquemag.v10i1.2547PsiqueMag; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): July - December; 34-45PsiqueMag; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2021): Julio - Diciembre; 34-452307-0846reponame:Revistas - Universidad César Vallejoinstname:Universidad César Vallejoinstacron:UCVspahttp://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/235/225Derechos de autor 2021 PsiqueMaghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.ucv.edu.pe:article/2352023-08-16T02:55:11Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura Self-Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self-Report (SRSI-SR): evidencias de validez, confiabilidad y equidad en estudiantes universitarios de la ciudad de Piura |
title |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura |
spellingShingle |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura Moscol Seminario, Jimena Autorregulación del aprendizaje Validez Confiabilidad Equidad Estudiantes universitarios Self-regulation of learning Validity Reliability Equity University students |
title_short |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura |
title_full |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura |
title_fullStr |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura |
title_sort |
Self-Regulation Strategies Self-Report Inventory (SRSI-SR): evidences of validity, reliability and equity in university students from the city of Piura |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Moscol Seminario, Jimena Olivas Ugarte, Lincol Orlando |
author |
Moscol Seminario, Jimena |
author_facet |
Moscol Seminario, Jimena Olivas Ugarte, Lincol Orlando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Olivas Ugarte, Lincol Orlando |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Autorregulación del aprendizaje Validez Confiabilidad Equidad Estudiantes universitarios Self-regulation of learning Validity Reliability Equity University students |
topic |
Autorregulación del aprendizaje Validez Confiabilidad Equidad Estudiantes universitarios Self-regulation of learning Validity Reliability Equity University students |
description |
The general objective of this research was to analyse the evidence of validity, reliability and equity of the Self Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self- Report. 189 college students participated between the ages of 18 and 42. The results obtained were found that items 4, 8 and 9 did not have adequate rates of corrected homogeneity or communality. Evidence of convergent validity in relation to selfconcept and academic self-efficacy and discriminatory validity in relation to exam anxiety. In addition, exploratory factorial analysis reported four factors with an explained variance of 69.55%, while the final confirmatory analysis, demonstrated fit of the four-factor correlated model (X2= 93,654, df= 71, X2/df= 1.31, CFI= .974, TLI= .967, RMSEA= .071, SRMR= .044). In addition, reliability was determined through the Alpha Ordinal coefficient by reporting an index in its dimensions of .85 in OT, .79 in HIR, .86 in OE, .86 in BI, and the total reliability of .96. Finally, evidence of equity by sex and age was found, affirming that the score comparison of this instrument based on these variables will be valid and reliable in subsequent studies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/235 10.18050/psiquemag.v10i1.2547 |
url |
http://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/235 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18050/psiquemag.v10i1.2547 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/psiquemag/article/view/235/225 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 PsiqueMag https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 PsiqueMag https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Cesar Vallejo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Cesar Vallejo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PsiqueMag; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): July - December; 34-45 PsiqueMag; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2021): Julio - Diciembre; 34-45 2307-0846 reponame:Revistas - Universidad César Vallejo instname:Universidad César Vallejo instacron:UCV |
instname_str |
Universidad César Vallejo |
instacron_str |
UCV |
institution |
UCV |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad César Vallejo |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad César Vallejo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1843709008151576576 |
score |
12.791002 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).