Degree of reliability of the assessment of the Bolton analysis in three-dimensional virtual models versus plaster models. A review

Descripción del Articulo

Introduction: Bolton analysis is used to determine anomalies with respect to the dental mass, for diagnosis and treatment planning purposes, the possibility of using a digital method was introduced and tested to measure the size of the mesiodistal tooth. In this way, digital dental technology has ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Loma Salcedo, Humberto, Huasco-Huarcaya, Nelly Erlinda
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Universidad Científica del Sur
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Científica del Sur
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.cientifica.edu.pe:article/1489
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/1489
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:modelos virtuales
modelos de yeso
Bolton
fiabilidad
virtual models
plaster models
reliability
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Bolton analysis is used to determine anomalies with respect to the dental mass, for diagnosis and treatment planning purposes, the possibility of using a digital method was introduced and tested to measure the size of the mesiodistal tooth. In this way, digital dental technology has made digital study models become popular in orthodontics. Objective: to evaluate the degree of reliability of the evaluation of the Bolton analysis in three-dimensional virtual models versus plaster models through a review of the literature. Materials and methods: A search was carried out in the primary databases of the international scientific literature on health sciences: Medline, through PubMed, SciELO, Lilacs, and Embase. Review articles published between the year 2000 and October 2021 were included. Results: The desktop scanner was the best option for digitizing dental models, but this does not detract from CBCT and intraoral laser scanners, which are still an option. Reasonable validity for digitizing 3D models with results within the "clinically acceptable" range was found. Conclusions: 3D digital models generated with intraoral and extraoral scanners are reliable and accurate compared to conventional impressions and save time, in most cases statistically significant differences were found, but of little clinical relevance.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).