PREPARATION OF CATALYSTS BASED ON Fe VANADYL PHOSPHATES SUPPORTED ON γ-Al2O3 FOR OXIDATIVE DEHYDROGENATION OF ETHANE

Descripción del Articulo

Catalysts based on vanadyl phosphates have been prepared for the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane to ethylene. The bulk catalysts VOP (VOPO4.2H2O), FeVOP(1) (Fe0.14VO0.86PO4) and FeVOP(2) (Fe0.21VO0.79PO4) have been synthesized by the Ladwig method, which consists in the preparation of vana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Baldeón, Iván, Sun-Kou, Rosario, Picasso, Gino
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Sociedad Química del Perú
Repositorio:Revista de la Sociedad Química del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:rsqp.revistas.sqperu.org.pe:article/237
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.sqperu.org.pe/index.php/revistasqperu/article/view/237
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:FeVOP
ODH
ethane
selectivity to ethylene
etano
selectividad a etileno.
Descripción
Sumario:Catalysts based on vanadyl phosphates have been prepared for the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane to ethylene. The bulk catalysts VOP (VOPO4.2H2O), FeVOP(1) (Fe0.14VO0.86PO4) and FeVOP(2) (Fe0.21VO0.79PO4) have been synthesized by the Ladwig method, which consists in the preparation of vanadyl phosphate under reflux with phosphoric acid. The catalysts supported on γ-Al2O3 (FeVOP-Al) were prepared by the wet impregnation method. From XRD, the bulk catalysts presented crystalline structures described by the arrangement of the tetrahedral of PO4 and of the octahedral VO6. The TPR analysis revealed that the introduction of Fe to the structure of the VOP forms less reducible species and in the case of the supported samples, the increase of the active phase linearly increased the consumption of H2. The γ-Al2O3 support to the iron-vanadyl-phosphate catalysts allowed the formation of ethylene and active centers in the ODH of ethane due to the formation of weak and intermediate acid sites and the catalyst-support interactions. The activity and selectivity of reaction to ethylene in the best supported sample increased up to 46,8 and 27,3% against the equivalent bulk catalyst that was 9,8% and 21,4 %.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).