Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva L...
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
Repositorio: | Odontología pediátrica |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.spo.com.pe:article/221 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas |
id |
REVSPO_9bf7de9bc509d0906c4db391ae45204f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.spo.com.pe:article/221 |
network_acronym_str |
REVSPO |
network_name_str |
Odontología pediátrica |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry Evaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátrica |
title |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry Ramírez Báez, Raquel Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas |
title_short |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
title_full |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ramírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel |
author |
Ramírez Báez, Raquel |
author_facet |
Ramírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas |
topic |
Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas |
description |
Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-29 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221 10.33738/spo.v21i2.221 |
url |
http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33738/spo.v21i2.221 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221/167 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 14-22 2709-4782 1814-487X 10.33738/spo.v21i2 reponame:Odontología pediátrica instname:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría instacron:SPO |
instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
instacron_str |
SPO |
institution |
SPO |
reponame_str |
Odontología pediátrica |
collection |
Odontología pediátrica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1756013998382252032 |
spelling |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistryEvaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátricaRamírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel Compressive strengthRestorative materialsdeciduous teethMechanical propertiesResistencia a la compresiónMateriales restauradoresDientes deciduosPropiedades mecánicasObjective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. Objetivo: El próposito de este estudio comparativo in vitro fue comparar la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados frecuentemente en odontopediatría. Material y métodos: Un total de 270 especiménes (n=90 por grupo) de los materiales restauradores Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® fueron elaborados de acuerdo con las instrucciones del fabricante. Se evaluó la resistencia a la compresión a una velocidad de cruceta de 0.75±0.30 mm/min a lo largo del eje longitudinal de los especímenes utilizando la máquina universal de ensayos posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento a partir de su elaboración. Los especímenes se almacenaron 37ºC con una humedad relativa de 50±10%. Los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente con las pruebas de ANOVA de una vía y Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: Posterior a los tres periodos de almacenamiento, Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos (166.2±36.3 MPa a 24 horas, 153.8±40.2 MPa a 48 horas y 167.3±36.2 MPa a 72 horas) versus EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Entre EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® no se obtuvo diferencia significativa (p>0.05). Los valores de resistencia a la compresión se incrementaron solo en EQUIA Forte® Fil sin diferencia significativa posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas (p>0.05). Conclusión: Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos de resistencia a la compresión posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento, lo que puede representar un mejor comportamiento clínico y mecánico de este material restaurador.Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría2022-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/22110.33738/spo.v21i2.221REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 14-222709-47821814-487X10.33738/spo.v21i2reponame:Odontología pediátricainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatríainstacron:SPOspahttp://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221/167Derechos de autor 2022 Raquel Ramírez Báez, Raúl Márquez Preciado, José Arturo Garrocho Rangel, Miguel Ángel Rosales Berberhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.spo.com.pe:article/2212022-12-29T21:43:56Z |
score |
13.977583 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).