Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ramírez Báez, Raquel, Márquez Preciado, Raúl, Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo, Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría
Repositorio:Odontología pediátrica
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.spo.com.pe:article/221
Enlace del recurso:http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Compressive strength
Restorative materials
deciduous teeth
Mechanical properties
Resistencia a la compresión
Materiales restauradores
Dientes deciduos
Propiedades mecánicas
id REVSPO_9bf7de9bc509d0906c4db391ae45204f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.spo.com.pe:article/221
network_acronym_str REVSPO
network_name_str Odontología pediátrica
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
Evaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátrica
title Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
Ramírez Báez, Raquel
Compressive strength
Restorative materials
deciduous teeth
Mechanical properties
Resistencia a la compresión
Materiales restauradores
Dientes deciduos
Propiedades mecánicas
title_short Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
title_full Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
title_sort Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ramírez Báez, Raquel
Márquez Preciado, Raúl
Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo
Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel
author Ramírez Báez, Raquel
author_facet Ramírez Báez, Raquel
Márquez Preciado, Raúl
Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo
Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel
author_role author
author2 Márquez Preciado, Raúl
Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo
Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Compressive strength
Restorative materials
deciduous teeth
Mechanical properties
Resistencia a la compresión
Materiales restauradores
Dientes deciduos
Propiedades mecánicas
topic Compressive strength
Restorative materials
deciduous teeth
Mechanical properties
Resistencia a la compresión
Materiales restauradores
Dientes deciduos
Propiedades mecánicas
description Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221
10.33738/spo.v21i2.221
url http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221
identifier_str_mv 10.33738/spo.v21i2.221
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221/167
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 14-22
2709-4782
1814-487X
10.33738/spo.v21i2
reponame:Odontología pediátrica
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría
instacron:SPO
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría
instacron_str SPO
institution SPO
reponame_str Odontología pediátrica
collection Odontología pediátrica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1756013998382252032
spelling Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistryEvaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátricaRamírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel Compressive strengthRestorative materialsdeciduous teethMechanical propertiesResistencia a la compresiónMateriales restauradoresDientes deciduosPropiedades mecánicasObjective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. Objetivo: El próposito de este estudio comparativo in vitro fue comparar la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados frecuentemente en odontopediatría. Material y métodos: Un total de 270 especiménes (n=90 por grupo) de los materiales restauradores Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® fueron elaborados de acuerdo con las instrucciones del fabricante. Se evaluó la resistencia a la compresión a una velocidad de cruceta de 0.75±0.30 mm/min a lo largo del eje longitudinal de los especímenes utilizando la máquina universal de ensayos posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento a partir de su elaboración. Los especímenes se almacenaron 37ºC con una humedad relativa de 50±10%. Los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente con las pruebas de ANOVA de una vía y Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: Posterior a los tres periodos de almacenamiento, Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos (166.2±36.3 MPa a 24 horas, 153.8±40.2 MPa a 48 horas y 167.3±36.2 MPa a 72 horas) versus EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Entre EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® no se obtuvo diferencia significativa (p>0.05). Los valores de resistencia a la compresión se incrementaron solo en EQUIA Forte® Fil sin diferencia significativa posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas (p>0.05). Conclusión: Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos de resistencia a la compresión posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento, lo que puede representar un mejor comportamiento clínico y mecánico de este material restaurador.Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría2022-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/22110.33738/spo.v21i2.221REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 14-222709-47821814-487X10.33738/spo.v21i2reponame:Odontología pediátricainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatríainstacron:SPOspahttp://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221/167Derechos de autor 2022 Raquel Ramírez Báez, Raúl Márquez Preciado, José Arturo Garrocho Rangel, Miguel Ángel Rosales Berberhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.spo.com.pe:article/2212022-12-29T21:43:56Z
score 13.977583
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).