Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva L...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
| Repositorio: | Odontología pediátrica |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaodontologiapediatrica.com:article/221 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties |
| id |
REVSPO_35d959f0ba71501d1f2f73c5424d1de4 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaodontologiapediatrica.com:article/221 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSPO |
| network_name_str |
Odontología pediátrica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry Evaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátrica |
| title |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
| spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry Ramírez Báez, Raquel Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties |
| title_short |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
| title_full |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
| title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
| title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ramírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel |
| author |
Ramírez Báez, Raquel |
| author_facet |
Ramírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties |
| topic |
Resistencia a la compresión Materiales restauradores Dientes deciduos Propiedades mecánicas Compressive strength Restorative materials deciduous teeth Mechanical properties |
| description |
Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-29 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221 10.33738/spo.v21i2.221 |
| url |
http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33738/spo.v21i2.221 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221/167 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 14-22 2709-4782 1814-487X 10.33738/spo.v21i2 reponame:Odontología pediátrica instname:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría instacron:SPO |
| instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
| instacron_str |
SPO |
| institution |
SPO |
| reponame_str |
Odontología pediátrica |
| collection |
Odontología pediátrica |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1846701562002407424 |
| spelling |
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistryEvaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátricaRamírez Báez, Raquel Márquez Preciado, Raúl Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel Resistencia a la compresiónMateriales restauradoresDientes deciduosPropiedades mecánicasCompressive strengthRestorative materialsdeciduous teethMechanical propertiesObjective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. Objetivo: El próposito de este estudio comparativo in vitro fue comparar la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados frecuentemente en odontopediatría. Material y métodos: Un total de 270 especiménes (n=90 por grupo) de los materiales restauradores Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® fueron elaborados de acuerdo con las instrucciones del fabricante. Se evaluó la resistencia a la compresión a una velocidad de cruceta de 0.75±0.30 mm/min a lo largo del eje longitudinal de los especímenes utilizando la máquina universal de ensayos posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento a partir de su elaboración. Los especímenes se almacenaron 37ºC con una humedad relativa de 50±10%. Los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente con las pruebas de ANOVA de una vía y Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: Posterior a los tres periodos de almacenamiento, Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos (166.2±36.3 MPa a 24 horas, 153.8±40.2 MPa a 48 horas y 167.3±36.2 MPa a 72 horas) versus EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Entre EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® no se obtuvo diferencia significativa (p>0.05). Los valores de resistencia a la compresión se incrementaron solo en EQUIA Forte® Fil sin diferencia significativa posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas (p>0.05). Conclusión: Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos de resistencia a la compresión posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento, lo que puede representar un mejor comportamiento clínico y mecánico de este material restaurador.Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría2022-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/22110.33738/spo.v21i2.221REVISTA ODONTOLOGÍA PEDIÁTRICA; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 14-222709-47821814-487X10.33738/spo.v21i2reponame:Odontología pediátricainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatríainstacron:SPOspahttp://www.op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/221/167Derechos de autor 2022 Raquel Ramírez Báez, Raúl Márquez Preciado, José Arturo Garrocho Rangel, Miguel Ángel Rosales Berberinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaodontologiapediatrica.com:article/2212022-12-30T02:43:56Z |
| score |
12.789436 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).