Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.

Descripción del Articulo

To determine the rate of hospital emergency cesarean infection and possible predisposing factors. DESIGN: Epidemiological study of transversal, retrospective and descriptive. PLACE: Maternal Perinatal Institute, Lima, Peru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients seen between January and June 1996 and had n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Meza, Luis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/1394
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1394
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_e35cb8f867eea554fc96322a48c9bb58
oai_identifier_str oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/1394
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
spelling Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.Infecciones intrahospitalarias en cesáreas de emergencia en el Instituto Materno Perinatal 1996.Meza, LuisTo determine the rate of hospital emergency cesarean infection and possible predisposing factors. DESIGN: Epidemiological study of transversal, retrospective and descriptive. PLACE: Maternal Perinatal Institute, Lima, Peru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients seen between January and June 1996 and had nosocomial infection criteria. RESULTS: 10962 births were Caesarean sections 2784 (25.4%), of which 421 had nosocomial infection cases (15.1%). The most common site of surgical wound infection was followed by endometritis and urinary tract infection. The infection occurred in 25% of children under 19 years, by 9% in those over 35 years, 56% of nulliparous, between 37 and 42 weeks gestation (82%), with inadequate prenatal care at 74%. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that around 50% of interventions in the morning presents nosocomial infections, there being increased infections shortening or lengthening the operative time.OBJETIVO: Determinar la tasa de infección intrahospitalaria por cesáreas de emergencias y los posibles factores predisponentes. DISEÑO: Estudio epidemiológico de tipo transversal, retrospectivo y descriptivo. LUGAR: Instituto Materno Perinatal, Lima, Perú. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Pacientes atendidas entre enero y junio de  1996 y que tuvieron criterios de infección intrahospitalaria. RESULTADOS: En 10962 partos, 2784 fueron cesáreas (25.4%), de las que presentaron infección intrahospitalaria 421 casos (15.1%). El lugar más frecuente de infección fue la herida operatoria, seguida de endometritis e infección urinaria. La infección se presentó en 25% de las menores de 19 años, en 9% en las mayores de 35 años, en 56% de nulíparas, entre 37 y 42 semanas de gestación (82%), con insuficiente control prenatal en 74%. CONCLUSIONES: Se encuentra que alrededor de 50% de intervenciones realizadas en la madrugada presenta infecciones intrahospitalarias, no existiendo incremento de las infecciones por acortamiento o prolongación del tiempo operatorio.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-07-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/139410.31403/rpgo.v46i1394The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2000); 84-87Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2000); 84-872304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1394/1347info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/13942026-01-12T19:08:10Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
Infecciones intrahospitalarias en cesáreas de emergencia en el Instituto Materno Perinatal 1996.
title Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
spellingShingle Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
Meza, Luis
title_short Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
title_full Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
title_fullStr Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
title_full_unstemmed Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
title_sort Nosocomial infections in emergency cesarean sections at the Maternal Perinatal Institute 1996.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Meza, Luis
author Meza, Luis
author_facet Meza, Luis
author_role author
description To determine the rate of hospital emergency cesarean infection and possible predisposing factors. DESIGN: Epidemiological study of transversal, retrospective and descriptive. PLACE: Maternal Perinatal Institute, Lima, Peru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients seen between January and June 1996 and had nosocomial infection criteria. RESULTS: 10962 births were Caesarean sections 2784 (25.4%), of which 421 had nosocomial infection cases (15.1%). The most common site of surgical wound infection was followed by endometritis and urinary tract infection. The infection occurred in 25% of children under 19 years, by 9% in those over 35 years, 56% of nulliparous, between 37 and 42 weeks gestation (82%), with inadequate prenatal care at 74%. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that around 50% of interventions in the morning presents nosocomial infections, there being increased infections shortening or lengthening the operative time.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1394
10.31403/rpgo.v46i1394
url https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1394
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v46i1394
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1394/1347
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2000); 84-87
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2000); 84-87
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868078729041805312
score 13.411838
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).